| Author |
 Replies: 9 / Views: 1,677 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
153 Posts |
Don't see it in Date or Liberty? Think I see it in "In God We Trust" I see in on the Reverse!  Sorry about getting the pictures out of order. Could you please tell me all you can about it. Grading, Value and anything else I need to know. Thank you, Beckie Image:  d.jpg86.82 KB Image: e.jpg73.82 KB Image: g.jpg82.87 KB Image: j.jpg83.06 KB Image: k.jpg84.79 KBIs this a RPM? If so how do I Image: a.jpg70.54 KB Image: b.jpg68.04 KB Image: c.jpg78.16 KBfind out the value and grading Please. |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
914 Posts |
Still looks mechanical, but remember, I'm not the expert here. What's interesting is that I have several 1964-D coins that look just like this. I haven't seen any years other than the 1964-D with that type of Mechanical Doubling. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Its Mechanical Doubling (the mintmark too) and it is pretty scratched up on the surface. Lots of hairlines. This one is not a high grade of any kind. Probably not XF with all the scratches. It would be considered a scrap silver piece so whatever a quarter would go for today based upon it's silver content is what this one is worth. Thanks, Bill |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
4fun, Machine Doubling was hard for me and my 54 yr old eyes. I have just purchased a nice scope and have gone thru a few thousands Lincolns since and have studied the difference between doubled die strikes and Machine Doubling. I am still learning but am much better at recognizing the difference, now. If you get the chance, spend sometime looking at them up real close, it will make a huge difference. Jim |
|
Valued Member
United States
161 Posts |
In the last pic...
What's going on over the A in DOLLAR?
Is that a dropped mint mark or something?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
914 Posts |
Firecom, that's a leaf with damage.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
Hey guys, looking at the last pic and the tail feathers, is that a "B" reverse?
Jim
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
914 Posts |
I don't believe so. The leaves are too weak.
Besides, 'B' is only for 1964-P.
Edited by Vaslin
11/21/2007 12:48 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
Types A and B exist for all year and mint mark 1956 thru 1964...type C only for 1964( according to BREEN) Happy Turkey to all!
Your coin is type A...condition whizzed F at best...worth melt $2.25
Edited by atlashealth
11/22/2007 10:53 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
To Clarify.
Type B has been found only on 1956 - 1964 Philadelphia minted quarters.
Type B is easiest to see by looking for a wider space between the E and S of States.
Type B has not been found on any Denver minted quarters (to my knowledge)
Type B refers to a modification of proof dies intended to be used from 1936 - 1964 and again from 1968 to 1972.
Type C is on 1964-D quarters not 1964 as suggested. Perhaps the poster simply omitted the Mintmark. These have stronger tail feathers as well as differences in the strength of the leaves.
Type C was also used on some 1968 S proof coins and then all proof quarters from 1973 through 1998
Type C is really the use of a die prepared for production of 1965 Clad quarters. One die accidentally got shipped to Denver and had a mintmark added and that one die produced the 1964-D Type C quarters.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,677 |
|
d.jpg
e.jpg
g.jpg
j.jpg
k.jpg
a.jpg
b.jpg
c.jpg
Posted 11/20/2007 10:32 pm
