| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,768 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
I think this might be my first Half Dime that does NOT have clash marks. However it does have a strike through or lamination on the reverse mostly noticeable on the I in DIME. What do you think PCGS gave this? 
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
449 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
UNC details? Proof? Not sure.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36575 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
246 Posts |
I have it MS 61 on the Obv and MS 63 Rev with a Net of
MS62
very nice coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1094 Posts |
I'll say MS-63 as well. Nice coin
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18640 Posts |
This is a pretty coin. I'm basing my grade off the reverse and I'll say they gave it MS63
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I want to call it AU58, but I keep coming back to those amazing fields. Not a Proof, unless EFL felt like spending five figures on a 1.3g coin.  MS63+.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1304 Posts |
PCGS AU55 In an old green holder. I like this coin as AU58. The lamination on the reverse would likely always keep it from MS but this coins fields are really nice. SsuperDdave I would like to get a proof of these in the future but probably one of the later dates so I don't spend quite that much for such a tiny coin! 
Edited by EFLargeCents 05/05/2015 08:37 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
246 Posts |
I admit that I know very little in terms of laminations, Half Dimes as well, but would a lamination really hold it back from MS as it would have been done at mint. Just curious, as I would have thought the only thing holding this coin down would have been the wear on the knee and head (if it is wear and not a weak strike/worn die.)
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,768 |
|