Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1865 -S Seated Half Wb-103

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,514Next Topic  
Valued Member
kkirby99's Avatar
United States
231 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  2:17 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add kkirby99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I just acquired this coin and wanted to share this very late die stage with you. Heritage has this late die stage with breaks and Cuds classified as an R.5 rarity. There's a lot going on with this reverse. Opinions on grade would be welcome also.

1865--S-Seated-Half-Wb-103

1865--S-Seated-Half-Wb-103

1865--S-Seated-Half-Wb-103

1865--S-Seated-Half-Wb-103

1865--S-Seated-Half-Wb-103
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  2:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Utterly fascinating coin. The Mint must have been up against a very solid production requirement to allow a die to go this late into life; gravity seems the only thing holding it together. Is there any cracking about the date or head on the obverse? By this late a stage on the reverse, there ought to be. I have it as an upper-end EF with a good argument for AU50.
Valued Member
kkirby99's Avatar
United States
231 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  2:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kkirby99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The obverse just has a hint of a break joining the 6 and 5, otherwise it is completely intact. Maybe this was the last working reverse die the SF mint had and were forced to use it until it fell apart literally. There is a photo on Heritage of one where the die break joining the IC has joined the rim and turned into a full Cud so mine wasn't the last one out of the mint but it possibly was just hours away from the end.
Edited by kkirby99
05/19/2015 2:59 pm
Pillar of the Community
ExoGuy's Avatar
United States
4416 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  2:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ExoGuy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ditto on Dave's synopsis ... I couldn't have summed it up better. Cool coin!
Pillar of the Community
MeadowviewCollector's Avatar
United States
4409 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  3:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MeadowviewCollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
One could put together a die state set of WB-103 for this date and mint mark. I have several different die states on my ebay watch list with most being low grade.

Here is a later die state than yours (I think, but could be mistaking wear for Cuds) that I watched but didn't grab at the time http://www.ebay.com/itm/1865-S-Seat...p=true&rt=nc

-MV
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  3:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is the coin which has me wondering:

http://coins.ha.com/itm/seated-half.../1216-4942.s

It's obviously earlier than kkirby99's reverse, but the obverse die cracks are far more prominent.
Valued Member
kkirby99's Avatar
United States
231 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  3:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kkirby99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
It's obviously earlier than kkirby99's reverse, but the obverse die cracks are far more prominent.

This makes me believe that they had more than one obverse die available but only one reverse left to use until it died.
Edited by kkirby99
05/19/2015 3:42 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2015  4:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
WB-103 is composed of two independent die pairs displaying similar undercutting of the 1 in the date, one being slightly stronger than the other. One of those pairs - known as Die Pair 7 - cracked in this fashion. It should probably only show recutting under the base of the 1. The other pair - apparently scarcer but there are far too few transactions of WB-103 to really have an opinion - didn't really crack too much.

If what little cracking you can see runs in exactly the same fashion as the other Die 7 coins on record, it's only then a question of how fast the obverse developed compared to the reverse. It could have gone from uncracked to fully-developed in ten strikes, or it could have taken thousands. Photography plays a large role in the perceived strength of die cracks, as well. One can expect cracks to be more prominent than they may be in hand, as the thinnest of cracks will reflect direct lighting.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,514Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.34 seconds to rattle this change. Forums