Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1967 Denver Cent With Mint Mark Not Suposed To Be There.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 6,643Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
chevrolet454ss's Avatar
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 12/23/2007  4:39 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add chevrolet454ss to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers

I found 1967 penny with an denver mint mark on bottem. In 1965 thru 1967 there were no mint marks on coins. It was found an fed box of coins about monlth ago. I cant explain it why it has an d under the 1967. Its brown since it come an fedbox of used coins.

I want post up here where you can me figure it out . My camara is cannon sd100 . I have problems and cant take close up of coins with for whatever reason. What is cheap camara I use to get close up on coins. I dont know. Any ideas how to take photos of it.

My problem I dont know what to about the 1967 cent with an mint mark under it. I looked in books and all over net, coppercoins website its not listed.

If this coin is real or not altered or anything. It could great find like an 1943 copper cent or ziggys 1982 doudle die.

My quastions on what do with it. I have talked with one dealer about looking at it with microscope and sending to Pgcs grading service to have it slabed or checked out since I think it needs to go to them.

Since I cant get photes of coin I think it needs sent off. I dont have any clue on what this could worth. Has an anybody seen or ever heard of coins 1965 thru 1967 found with denver or s mint marks.I never have.

I dont know if could be 1961 thru 64 cent or 68 thru 69 coin from denver where it stuck from greese or anything to make it like an 7 on end of coin.

The problem with Dealer who an Pgcs dealer. They are over an 100 miles drive in car to get to them. With prices on gas its going be expensive to drive that far. I live in south texas and there no other dealers becides him I would trust with coin.

Are any companys I can mail to get checked out since Pgcs onley uses dealers. I am starting not like Pcgs since they dont take coins from non dealers for whatever reason. If could I would send direct pgcs . Reason they are best grading service and all coin peaple trust there grades. I wish I knew they dont take coins from non dealers.

Chevrolet454ss
Pillar of the Community
Metalman's Avatar
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 12/23/2007  4:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PCGS likely will likely not attribute it ,, anacs or ICG will.

It would be nice to see some pics though .

Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 12/23/2007  4:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PCGS isn't cheap to join, but they definitely do not limit their business to dealers. I'm a member, and submit directly to them all the time. The membership is roughly $100/yr.

Now, having said that, it's pretty much certain that the mint mark has been raised on the coin after it was minted. It's possible for someone with the right skills to draw metal up from around the face of the coin into what looks like a proper mint mark in the right place; you have to look pretty closely to see where metal was displaced to build the mint mark. I have seen or heard of both 1914-D's and 1931-S's being faked this way. The US Mint did not produce any dies with mint marks in 1965-1967, as you know, so it's pretty unlikely that they were involved.
Valued Member
chevrolet454ss's Avatar
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 12/23/2007  5:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chevrolet454ss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Metalman,

Why would pcgs not attribute it. You have ideas on geting photes of it . I wish I knew .

So how do you get the close up on coins and stuff and what is needed to do that with coins. I short on cash these days to buy that expensive camaras. My scanner dont work very good. I paid 49.95 for it at Walmart last year. It just makes them super small brown things. Is trick on how to enlarge it ?

So how they done on photes of coins. Becides that coin I have two more I need to get checked.

Chevrolet454ss
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 12/23/2007  6:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That would be a very cool find if proven genuine! However, if one authentic 67-D is out there, there should be a few others. Still, good luck!
Valued Member
Jorgy's Avatar
United States
145 Posts
 Posted 12/23/2007  8:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jorgy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Most modern scanner will do a decent enough job on a coin if you know how to do it. You need to get out the manual and read about how to tweak the settings. With mine I go to "Import from twain" function in my photoplus program and choose my scanner. Then I go to custom settings and choose 1200dpi. Then do preview and then once the coin comes up in the preview area(looks like a 1/2inch dot that is barely recognizable as a coin on my 19" monitor) then choose just the coin area. Not sure if this function is the same on all programs but with mine it shows dotted lines that you drag to the size and area you want. Then hit scan and it should come up with a good sized picture. I just scanned this cent with my cheapo scanner/printer and though it leave a lot to be desired it still shows details. Hope this helps.

1967-Denver-Cent-With-Mint-Mark-Not-Suposed-To-Be-There.
Valued Member
Jorgy's Avatar
United States
145 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  12:13 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jorgy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Weird, my last post shows in this thread but in the thread index list doesn't show that I replied to message.
Valued Member
chevrolet454ss's Avatar
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  02:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chevrolet454ss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I tryed and I hope it came out.
Valued Member
chevrolet454ss's Avatar
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  02:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chevrolet454ss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What I am doing wrong.

I put at 1200 dpi my cheaper scanner it was 3.2 megs and would never load.

I went back to 200 dpi and it would load up and just has an x in place.

Chevrolet454ss
Valued Member
chevrolet454ss's Avatar
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  02:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chevrolet454ss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1967-Denver-Cent-With-Mint-Mark-Not-Suposed-To-Be-There.


I think it went thru
Valued Member
chevrolet454ss's Avatar
United States
314 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  03:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chevrolet454ss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It went thru and for whatever reason you need click on it. Sorry it upside down . I tryed the best I can scann. I not very good with things.

Chevrolet 454ss
Pillar of the Community
j_h_s's Avatar
United States
1934 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  05:50 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add j_h_s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Judging only by the pictures...I'm not convinced it's a 67.
Pillar of the Community
KurtS's Avatar
United States
5318 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  12:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KurtS to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can't tell much at that scan size, but the 7 doesn't look very clean. I'd need to see a bigger pic, but it could also be post-mint damage that resembles a 7.
Pillar of the Community
chrsb's Avatar
United States
936 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  12:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add chrsb to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a "3" to me.
Valued Member
Jorgy's Avatar
United States
145 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  2:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jorgy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Try it at 600dpi and then reduce the file size with your graphics program.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2007  3:58 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There is no such thing. It's not even possible. It will turn out that the lasdt digit is something else and has been damaged.

Thanks,
Bill
  Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 6,643Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Forums