| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,911 |
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
I recently bought a Nikon D40x SLR camera and have been playing around with different setups and lighting. It is a lot tougher than it looks. The lighting is the toughest to figure out. I have been using a couple 100watt compact flourescent daylight bulbs. They work well, but the placement has a significant impact on the look of the coin. Maybe I need to use a diffuser or something. I get the lights very close to the coin to avoid dark areas but that causes "hot spots" and sometimes a washed out look. I took these pics in aperature priority mode and cranked it up to make sure the entire coin is in focus. Let me know what you think about the pics and if you have any pointers. Thanks! Click on the pics for a larger version.      
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
32 Posts |
One more:  
Edited by keh 12/25/2007 9:20 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
32 Posts |
Here is one where I adjusted the brightness and contrast slightly in Photoshop:  
Edited by keh 12/25/2007 9:24 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
Generally these look pretty good. I find the focus "soft" and not quite enough contrast...what lens are you using? Have you done any processing to increase contrast and sharpness, or are these untouched?
(Nice coins, by the way!)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2443 Posts |
Look good, but I agree with hunter that they look a little soft. But sharpening them in photoshop should work.
|
|
New Member
 United States
32 Posts |
Thanks for the comments. Except for the last pic these pics are untouched. I added a little bit of contrast to the last pic. I've played around in photoshop with more contrast but it tends to accentuate the bag marks on these coins.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
very nice pictures, and the coins aint to bad either. A 1978-CC is one 1878 Morgan I have not ever owned and I have no idea why, guess I need to make one of them my next purchase, maybe a good MS-69 in a SGS holder or something 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
100 Posts |
Nice shots, and beautiful coins by the way!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
nice pics and cc morgans are my favorites in that series. Even better ifits a toned cc.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19930 Posts |
Great pics, I don't think they are "soft" at all. I do think you just need a little more light and a hair of white balance adjustment (assuming your background is white). Nice camera! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
You're probably right, BadThad. My monitor is nothing to brag about, and the softness I see could be the result of it's weaknesses, not the photos. I do like SHARP photos of coins. A bias on my part.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
OK, it looks like you've got the camera pretty well figured out. Nothing left to talk about there.  From my viewpoint, using a diffuser will likely increase the "washed-out" look of the coin - you lose the opportunity for contrast with diffused light because it leaves very little shadow upon which to base the contrast. If you're using CFL's, you're probably unable to get them perpendicular enough to the coin. Especially with lustrous silver, I'm a fan of direct lighting to create the necessary contrast for what I think is a "good" coin picture.  Remember, though - it's about what works for you, not for me. I shoot pics like the one above because I like them, not because anybody else thinks they're "good" pics. If the details are clear, and you're getting a fair representation of luster, then the result is satisfactory. I use two small MR16 spots for lighting, totaling 100w. I can get them close enough to the lens to touch the barrel, and they're so small that I can get pretty much directly above the coin. Note my sophisticated lighting rig:  I've since gone to a copystand for the camera instead of a tripod, but the lighting setup isn't changed.
|
|
New Member
 United States
32 Posts |
Thanks again for the comments everyone!
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,911 |
|