First Page
Previous Page
Posted 06/06/2015 1:59 pm
Over the years I have noticed disagreement in points of views on certain coins and types of varieties /errors.
Coneca, Wexler, Coppercoins , certain varieties one sees as legit the other does not. In some cases it all boils down to what the attributer sees as correct.
Years ago I sent three coins to Coneca. One was found to be new discovery 1948 DDR quarter. The other two were found to be abrasion doubling.
Now years later one of the abrasion doubled coins is listed as a DDR on Coppercoins.com and the other I posted here on this forum and was unanimously seen as a hot lips dime with massively clashed dies.
Views change, what was thought to be is found not and those taken for fact are reconsidered.
Many thanks for your input SD , definitely food for thought
Coneca, Wexler, Coppercoins , certain varieties one sees as legit the other does not. In some cases it all boils down to what the attributer sees as correct.
Years ago I sent three coins to Coneca. One was found to be new discovery 1948 DDR quarter. The other two were found to be abrasion doubling.
Now years later one of the abrasion doubled coins is listed as a DDR on Coppercoins.com and the other I posted here on this forum and was unanimously seen as a hot lips dime with massively clashed dies.
Views change, what was thought to be is found not and those taken for fact are reconsidered.
Many thanks for your input SD , definitely food for thought
