| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,219 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
92 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
I'm gonna say au58 nice die cracks on obverse
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2589 Posts |
I would say AU-58, but its hard to tell definitively as the photos are poorly lit
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
246 Posts |
I see AU55 range, with what appears to be nice luster on the first obverse picture. Nice coin, love these little dollars.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
AU-55. The $1 gold is one of my favorite series to collect.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1295 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
469 Posts |
AU-55 from me as well, very appealing die cracks!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
The reverse appears lackluster which may be a sign of bezel removed.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
92 Posts |
Thanks for your input everyone! The reverse has cartwheel luster remaining although not as much as the obverse. The lighting on the reverse was also different because the pictures I took with the same setup as the obverse were all blurry. This is what led to the difference in coloration and visible luster in the images. The surfaces are much more similar in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Unless it's the lighting, the rev. looks cleaned.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,219 |
|