| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,598 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
It seems to be in pretty good condition. There does seem to be a little toning on the reverse. Thoughts?   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9866 Posts |
VG10
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1295 Posts |
Wow, tough crowd. I see this one as a very nice F-15.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
No detail in crown, I highly disagree with F15.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Quote:
Wow, tough crowd. I see this one as a very nice F-15. Fine-15 by US grading standards perhaps. By Canadian standards, this is no more than a VG-10. The coin also have obvious env. damage and was likely dug up after being in the ground for a while. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Taiwan
606 Posts |
This coin would not receive a numeric grade from PCGS or NGC as it is damaged.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9866 Posts |
Nobody would send this coin to PCGS or NGC, it's worth less than $4, we're accommodating and will give anything a numerical grade, corroded or not.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Taiwan
606 Posts |
DBM: I agree with everything you say. I was not very clear. I was referring to zxcccxz post as to U.S. grading standards which PCGS and NGC reflect. By Canadian grading standards (ICCS) a damaged coin can receive a numerical grade with the problem mentioned. This seems to be a popular approach.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,598 |
|
Posted 07/11/2015 01:35 am
