| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 1,465 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The seller in the title lists the coin as a MS64 DMPL in a ICG holder, but the coin is actually in a PCI holder. The coin looks at best MS 61 or 62. Any chance the coin is DMPL? See link below. 361369680529 |
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
IMHO it is NOT DMPL. it's not a bad coin , I'd give it MS-63.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
There is absolutely no way that you can view those gosh-awful photos and tell anything at all about grade or DMPL. At best all you can do is hope this third rate TPG was within a point or two. I myself never buy when I can't have confidence in the photos or the TPG. |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
It might make PL at best but the photo is not good enough to judge that. I agree with MS63 as the top.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Possibly PL, but not DMPL. But seller is being possibly being slippery imo, or else he missed the fact it's in a PCI slab (as Slider mentioned) and not ICG. The reason I say slippery, is that ebay will let you say anything you want about a coin if it's in an approved slab, like numerical grades, etc. Edited by edweather
08/25/2015 4:25 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree with mox - who could really say anything definitive from these photos?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
PCI was only getting grades right via luck in those days, so one may reasonably assume it's neither 64 nor DMPL. I wouldn't presume to discern the seller's motive, but it bears mentioning that calling it an ICG coin allows him to list the grade in the title....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2233 Posts |
This has to be MS63. No way in expletive deleted is this DMPL. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
DMPL?
ROFL, more likely.
It's not even PL, in my opinion. Seller freely admits to manipulating the photo colors in his listing (!)
Other than that, it's a decent Morgan, at least from what you can see.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
I wouldn't buy. looks like a 63, but impossible to tell if it is DMPL, although it most likely isn't. Plus the seller said it was ICG but it is PCI. ebay wont let you post a numerical grade, unless it is graded by PCGS, NGC, Anacs, or ICG. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Looks like a commercial BU, meaning MS-60 to 62 with lots of small scrapes and nicks. Luster looks strong but I'd bet it's ordinary frosty luster, with little or no mirror character.
Common date, low-end BU coin; value accordingly! Anything over $40 I'd say is too much to pay. At the current bid of $31 with free shipping it's a decent buy.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,465 |
|
Posted 08/25/2015 3:47 pm
