| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,482 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
I spent some time trying to decide what I'm looking at. The wash on this die has my eyes dancing and it's late. But I see some thickness and a split at the end of the loop on the 2. I'll need to take more pictures tomorrow but here is the date:  Thanks for looking!
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
946 Posts |
I have a couple that look like that. You will want to check out the "In God We Trust" I know you can see some doubling on the E and Ts
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4809 Posts |
Hi folks - thanks for having a look. I was getting a little bleary eyed last night but will have a closer look tonight and expand the picture portfolio. I was trying to assess which DDO it might be at Wexler's site in order to take more directed shots of key areas where markers/features are most prominent. I looked at IGWT quite a bit, but the die wash there is making identification difficult. Oddly, however, the fields in the coin are smooth and die scratches (in key areas)aren't available (at least at quick glance). Soooo.... With that said, I'm hopeful that the members here can, based on what they see, direct me to key areas that they might need to see to attribute this coin (assuming it is DDO). My feeling is that I have a late stage (perhaps D) DDO. Seems that I've been finding these lately for some reason. Finding earlier die state specimens sure would make identification easier. But where's the fun in that I suppose. Thanks again folks!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4809 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
I don't know much about these 1972 pennies Rackster. I'd like to help. If you need more than Cwb's link for the 005 and 006, I have some pics for the 002, 003, and 008. I will post them if you can use them, just let me know.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4809 Posts |
Thanks CM - I appreciate the offer. I took a look last night at Wexler's site as he has a comprehensive overview for a number of the DDOs. I see things that look like it...but maybe not perfectly. And the deterioration is making me toggle on if it is...or isn't a DDO (vs. deterioration). I just can't toss it back to the wild just yet. I'll look there again tomorrow...there's always tomorrow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
I hope it works out Rackster, hopefully Coop will weigh in.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1249 Posts |
Yeah its minor so count me out of being able to help. I can see what your talking about on the 2 clear as day but I keep playing a game I always play myself and I need more proof . I hope coop comes in to help you also . I'm mainly posting to keep you up top so he will hopefully see it ;)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4809 Posts |
CM/tweak - thanks for the bump! Yes, I am hoping one of our members who collect 1972s might have some insight to share.
Claude - thank you for the link. I was looking at -010 (I think) but I'm still guessing.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
261 Posts |
Your first large photo of the date seems to show similarity to the DDO on the inside of the upper loop of the 2. It also looks like a very minor split on the outside of the right side of the 9 from top to bottom. 2nd large photo of the date seems to lose that detail. Only what a novice sees though.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I'm not seeing any hub doubling in these images. The marks on the 9 & 2 looks like contact marks. Machine damage on the right side of the 1.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4809 Posts |
Looking at the shape of the date devices, it kind of looks like Coppercoins 1DO-005 but also a bit like Wexlers -010. However, I can't find any of the markers on my coin. About 9 o'clock on the loop of the 9 is a raised area. the 10 to 1 o'clock area on the loop looks a bit flattened in hand. And I don't see burnished material. There is a contact mark at the top of the 2 near where the split in the device is. But it does not affect where the device meets the coin field. IG of IGWT is thicker in the same spots as the -005, but the wash there is so grainy that it obliterates being able to see any faint knit lines on the devices like you see at Coppercoins. Is it thick from doubling...or deterioration. Maybe there's a clue in the L and the E in LIBERTY. But the wash on the device may be obliterating the doubling there.  Thanks for the input folks. 
Edited by Rackster 09/17/2015 10:34 pm
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,482 |
|