| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,045 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3330 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Looks like a die crack to me, unless the center is incuse - then it would be PSD.
Edited by CoinMasters 10/25/2015 9:42 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
It's not a die crack. If it were a die crack, the line would be raised, but it looks incuse to me. Maybe a small lamination or other planchet defect.
Edited by cwb 10/25/2015 9:59 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3330 Posts |
Quote: Maybe a small lamination or other planchet defect. Is a lamination possible on a plated cent? Might it be a plating peel?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
Quote: Is a lamination possible on a plated cent? No, I completely missed the date. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3330 Posts |
It is ok - I stay confused and miss dates!   
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3330 Posts |
I have been still puzzling over this. I tried a photo at an angle. It appears that the field to the SW of this feature is raised higher than the field to the NW. This is leading me to think that it is a bi-level die crack. What am I missing? 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Looks like it is raised because of split plating? I see zinc in the last image. What split it? I'm not sure.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3330 Posts |
Quote: I see zinc in the last image. If it were a bi-level die crack, wouldn't zinc be visible also?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I don't this so as a die crack is incuse. An incuse line on the die would show as raised on the coin. But circulation may have split the raised crack open exposing the zinc making it raised?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3330 Posts |
Quote: But circulation may have split the raised crack open exposing the zinc making it raised? I can understand this. However, I do not understand what you are saying here: Quote: I don't this so as a die crack is incuse. Did you leave a word out?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I was answering your question: Quote: If it were a bi-level die crack, wouldn't zinc be visible also? But I see what I forgot: I don't this so as a die crack is incuse on the die.
Edited by coop 10/27/2015 01:06 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
I don't think so, as a die crack is incuse on the die.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3330 Posts |
Thanks CM - I understand the message now. Of course I know that...and it produces a raised area(line) on the coin. It may be perspective and/or light/shadow plays, but in the last image I posted, the arrows sit on an area of the field which appears raised - higher than the area on the opposite side of the crack/line. I don't know what is going on between the last arrow and the Memorial top, but it looks like zinc deterioration to me.
So I continue to lean in the direction of thinking that this is a bi-level die crack.
Edited by Pete2226 10/27/2015 06:18 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
I don't think it's a bi-level, Pete. If it were, you'd see more zinc/rot. I believe the area you're seeing as raised is plating pushed up from oxidation underneath. There is no displacement due to the crack.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
It's a 93-D Bizzaro Crack. 
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,045 |