Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1971 No "S" Proof Jefferson Nickel? Experts Please Assist!

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 3,989Next Topic  
New Member
Medalmind's Avatar
United States
44 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  06:31 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Medalmind to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
So, Ive compared the 1971, 5 cent with 1969 "S" 1971 "D" and 1970 "S" Jefferson nickels. I did this comparison to see if there were difference's in (Discription's) between nickel's San Francisco minted v.s Denver and Philly.

I envaluated and concluded that San Francisco mint's differ between Denver and Phillidelphia. I notice that each mint is slightly different from "ONE" discriptive in alpha and numeral.

Hope, I didn't make a fool of myself if did... please just note this on the account" that I'm still green. For what it's worth after comparing the 3 Mintage's, thus added weight in percentage to possible 1971 no "S" proof.

Regardless, fact remains unconfirmed and possibility's challenged, so it is why, I seek your expertise, please advise with your thoughts and opinion?

Thank you

1971-No-

1971-No-
Edited by Medalmind
10/30/2015 07:04 am
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  06:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Your coin looks to be a business strike not a proof.
John1
Valued Member
United States
214 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  07:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add teo2015 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
, looks like a business strike.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  09:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The business strike and proof strike can be noted by the finish on them:
1971-No-
1971-No-
1971-No-
Pillar of the Community
OcalaFlorida's Avatar
United States
2824 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  10:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add OcalaFlorida to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You have a business strike coin..

You can compare it to this example to see the differences

1971-No-
Pillar of the Community
billymac11's Avatar
United States
613 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  12:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add billymac11 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just curious as to what made you think it's a proof coin? Did it come from circulation? Did you buy it labelled proof?
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  1:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think your confusion lies in the fact that San Francisco produced business strike nickels, in addition to proof strikes, from 1968 to 1970. All S-mint nickels after 1970 are proof-only issues.
Pillar of the Community
JDRMCB's Avatar
United States
616 Posts
 Posted 10/30/2015  4:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JDRMCB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, and adding to the confusion is the fact that the Dansco 8113 album did not include a hole for the S-Proof nickel in '68,'69 or '70?! They officially started designating the S-Proof's in 1971.




1971-No-


This is just one of the many omission flaws that plague an otherwise great coin album manufacturing company.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 3,989Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Forums