| Author |
Replies: 13,316 / Views: 1,069,502 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2168 Posts |
I haven't gone through any in a while but I have a few rolls I haven't checked yet so I hope to have some good finds. I haven't seen a nickel as described with no mint mark for a War Nickel.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
CoinCbass,
I'd like to, but answer a couple of questions for me.
1. How do you guys take pictures of coins and get them to come out well?
2. How do you post pictures into a comment on a thread on this forum?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
You may notice a lighting difference. The first and third pictures were taken in one room, and the second and fourth pictures were taken in another room.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
BTW, my older son, not my coin collecting younger son, is the one who figured out how to post the pictures.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
102 Posts |
Jon, my first thought was that your coin was a Henning counterfeit nickel, but those were only dated 1944. It may be Struck Through Grease
|
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
ksammut,
Yeah, I still need to take pictures. Once I do, I will post it up!
Too bad I left it out of the original pic, since all of those are in 2x2 or tubes now. Would have been nice for them all to be together as a good string of boxes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
I take pics using my iPhone through a 10x loupe
I had to scratch my head on posting pics to an existing thread, but realized I could post text and submit it. Then edit my post to upload the pics. Not sure if that's the best way, but I couldn't figure it out, so that's what I do.
Starting a new thread there is an option to upload.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
192314 Posts |
Quote: Starting a new thread there is an option to upload. If you click on Reply to Topic instead of using the Quick Reply box, you will see the same option. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1157 Posts |
Just finished the first box of the new year and it was a good one :-)
2 1943p, 1 of which is very nice looking and an upgrade to the album. Also kept 15 nickels with mintages < 100 million.
Still missing:
1938d 1938s 1939d 1939s 1943d 1943s 1944s 1945d 1947d 1950d 1951d
I am assuming that the 47d and the 51d will be next to arrive, but I will be very happy if that is not the case!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
For those who have commented so far, does anyone think my mint-markless 1943 has any value?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
ironically, I just found one too. however, if you hold it in the right light you can BARELY make out the P. I wonder if they were Struck Through Grease? I didn't notice any other indications on mine. Was going to post it at some point. Try posting it over in the modern errors section. you'll likely get more input.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
I looked at my mintmark-less nickel with a microscope with several different filters, and at different angles. There is no evidence of any mintmark ever being there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1234 Posts |
Look up counterfeit nickels, I saw a post the other day but don't remember the link
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6130 Posts |
That '43 with no mintmark looks a little too sharp to be a Henning, so my guess is a grease error. I believe Henning used the same reverse on all of his nickels, which are characterized by a hole in the bottom of the R in "PLURIBUS".  If your nickel looks like this, you have a good shot at a Henning nickel, which I think is worth a good $30-50 (despite technically being illegal to own). I'm thinking I see a ghost of an S up there. Try inverting the colors of the picture. I found a mintmark-less War Nickel a while ago, but enhancing the contrast and inverting the colors did wonders:  
|
| |
Replies: 13,316 / Views: 1,069,502 |