| Author |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,366 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
434 Posts |
I believe this is an RPM. I see two D's. I don't know if that faint shadow to the left would be a third D. I welcome your feedback. :) 
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Note how it is raising upward from the corner? I'm thinking MD because the metal looks moved.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
434 Posts |
The bottom left of the D looks like the metal split apart (the shiny part). However inside the shiny D looks to be part of another D.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Hi MS - unless the coin is in high state, it can be difficult to pinpoint doubling (tripling). I see what you are seeing, but it's pretty common. I agree with Coop that there was movement causing damage at the site. I also see a hit to the mintmark and Die Deterioration (the wash adjacent to the bar).
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
434 Posts |
Oh ok. Thanks for the information. I use a 10X Loupe when looking then put it under USB Microscope. Should I get a higher magnified Loupe, or will 10X pick up RPMs good? Thanks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Hi MS - my approach is to sort under a 4" magnified lamp. I don't recall if it's 3X or higher, but enough to do the gross review. I then put specimens under 20X magnification using my AmScope. I can go to 40X, but very, very seldom event. 20X seems to work for me. That said, I would be more inclined to go to a 10X check than a 40X check if that helps. It's usually better to see a bigger section of the coin than zooming in at 40X.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
434 Posts |
Oh ok. Thanks for the tip. :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
It was a good question. I've seen a few threads discuss magnification early on when I got here. After getting back into CRH, the experience factor is playing in. I almost bought a more powerful microscope. In retrospect, it would have been a mistake. I have a USB scope with higher magnification which actually a problem. No small a field t study. Additionally, the LED lights are too bright. Terrible for takin pictures. To get it to work marginally, I have to apply many tricks to get a poor quality picture. For that reason, it stays in the box I got it in.
I'm nearing 50 and the eyes aren't what they used to be. Magnification is a must. But a pair of reading glasses works about as well as the 4" loop. Better even. So what you should be after is OPTIMAL magnification. So wait for a few more answers and dial in on what is optimal for you. Best of luck to you!
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,366 |
|