| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,091 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1005 Posts |
Opinions on grade of this coin are much appreciated!  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3186 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
 PO-01 Just enough of the date to be identified, but that's all.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Obverse is a G/VG, while the reverse is a PO-1. That makes me wonder if there is a die pair that caused the reverse to be incredibly weak. I know the S-121 die pair for 1797 did. Condor?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
This is very similar to the 1795 I posted a few days ago. I think it gets PO-01 as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
Tough call. The obverse is an AG, but reverse is entirely gone. Is the reverse enough to pull this back down to PO1 despite a "relatively solid" obverse? Cool coin!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
 FR-2. It appears to me that obverse has to much details for this coin to be PO-1.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
may be strong enough obverse to go FR02
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
I think the reverse was purposely sanded down then it circulated like so.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,091 |
|