| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,546 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Key date, so it gets a pass.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
Just overly worn, I wouldn't say cleaned as much as just rubbed to within an inch of it's life. Looks okay to me, probably got the color from spending a few years in an album.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
 with westcoin, has said it well. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
7096 Posts |
Looks like an honest well circulated coin to me. I am pretty sure that if there was evidence of this being "Cleaned" NGC would have picked it up regardless of it being a Key date  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I Agree , I don't see any problems with this coin. Not even a cleaning.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Quote:
I am pretty sure that if there was evidence of this being "Cleaned" NGC would have picked it up regardless of it being a Key date With high value key date coins, PCGS and NGC tend to be a little more liberal on grading than they would otherwise, especially popular coins like the '09 S-VDB, 1877 IHC, 1885/1886 Liberty nickels, 1916/1921 Walkers, 1916/1921 SLQ, etc, etc. I do not know the reasoning behind this, but key date coins are less likely to be body-bagged than common dates in the same series. Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
On a 1916-D Merc it would have to be scrubbed with steel wool to be called cleaned. A TPG might knock the grade down a touch if the cleaning was harsh but not abrasive. This example looks like little more than an old soap and water cleaning that many coins over 80 years old have received. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Looks find to me. Black "circulation cameo" is built up in protected places where wear cant get to it, and it looks unbroken telling me that no cleaning has been done to this coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
I agree it looks relatively problem free I don't detect any real cleaning.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36883 Posts |
Most likely cleaned long ago.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
problem free
water and rag wash
happy 100th birthday to that little darling
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Looks very typical of well-worn Mercs to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4932 Posts |
Hmm. Strange, I figured it was cleaned. Looks cleaned from the obverse.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
108 Posts |
I would say definitely cleaned.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,546 |
|
Posted 01/01/2016 02:32 am
