| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,876 |
|
New Member
Australia
15 Posts |
Hi everyone and happy new year I'm putting together a list of Morgan coins to send to PCGS and need your opinion re the below one As per my opinion I see it AU53 at worst or AU55 at best, let's see how close I am from the consensus :)   Thanks |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36724 Posts |
The detail is there for AU but no luster. AU-50
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
I think you would be lucky to get a straight AU grade on this one, not sure I would take a chance on TPG |
|
Valued Member
United States
457 Posts |
AU50 seems about right. Nice CC.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
AU-50. Nice original piece.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-50 sounds right to me as well.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Oh, and -  |
|
New Member
 Australia
15 Posts |
Thanks everyone, looks like the majority goes towards AU50
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18657 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
62 Posts |
Ok, personally, I'd say at least AU 58. The fact that it doesn't have luster doesn't mean jack, because it's toned. Coins with this kind of toning can be 65 or even above. The contact marks and wear are very minimal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3058 Posts |
AU-50?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I see this as being at least AU-53.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
Depending on luster...
If any, 50.
If none, 45.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
121 Posts |
Trying to decide if the nose area would keep it out of AU range.
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,876 |
Posted 01/01/2016 1:17 pm
