| Author |
Replies: 28 / Views: 3,409 |
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
It could be neither depending on the assigned grade.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
129 Posts |
These are the stock pics....  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
Yea the one pic has an unfortunate glare to really tell but that 1885 is gorgeous looks better in the NGC holder too,for me
Edited by Slamnbass 02/18/2016 01:49 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
BOTH  But, really the 1885.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 I have to go with the 85 . Clean face !
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
Those are great. why are they not designated proof like?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I would vote 1885 as well.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
129 Posts |
thanks for the responses guys they are really nice.....I will probably get the 85 if its still available!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts |
Thats a tough choice. I think a lot of the thought process from the comments is the pic quality for #1. It looks like a duplicate to a near unc Eagle I bought and posted a pic of on another thread. Before you posted the second graded pic. I would have chosen #2 as well. Not so sure now.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
398 Posts |
Flip a coin ..... Tough call .....
Out of the gate I liked the first choice but after studying unsure ..... But I would probably vote for first coin based on pics shown!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
79 Posts |
I like the 1881, cleaner face. Both are beautiful coins though! The scuff on the bottom of the neck of the 85 would bother me more than the neck scuff on the 81.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
256 Posts |
Tough call,probably the 1885. Anynody know how old the PCGS holder is on the 81s?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3193 Posts |
For me it's the 1885. Both are beautiful but the 85 is the strongest if you ask me.
|
| |
Replies: 28 / Views: 3,409 |