Can You See It !!!

It looks like a "3" to me. I'm very curious to see what CONECA had to say.

I agree looks like a 5 over 3, possibly 5 over 8. I'm just wondering, how do you find these sorts of errors? lol There so hard see by the nacked eye!

Rick, any speculation on how a 1945 Merc became overdated on a 1943? I can see a 45 die on top of a 44, but two years apart? Is this a recognized error and what does CONECA say?

C'mon, spill your guts; it's been long enough...

Fred

Somebody used an S instead of a 5, caught their mistake and punched in a 5?

Sorry for not responding to the post earlier, but as most know I work a late swing shift,,

I can tell you in hand it looks more like an 8 even though when I fiest found it I also thought it was a 3,, I base this on the complete loop on the bottom, the outside to the left is visable in the loop of the 5,,

That is where things tend to get very interesting !! since the Merc series ended in 45 !!

There seems to be no way for a 5 over 8 overdate ,, although I can imagine a few different senarios where it could happen !!

Fred to answer your question, if the coin turns out to be a legitimate overdate it will be a new variety ,, As of this time I'm having a hard time getting any attention to the coin.

Here is What I received back from coneca, disappointing at the best !!

I would have thought with all of the different things that have happened or could happen at the US mint, they would have been a little more open minded,,

First response ,
Rick:

I can't tell much from the photo. True die doubling
will have split serifs in the digits. There are
several kinds of false doubling, but the most
prevailent on the Merc dimes is machine damage
doubling which is flat, shelf-like and close to the
field. True die doubling must have splits in the
serifs.

Thanks,

James Wiles

Its obvious to me that They did not spend anytime examining the photo.

I emailed them back with a further description of what I thought I was seeing on the coin !!

Second response !
Rick:

If it is too good to be true it probably is. The
chance of there being an 8 under the 5 is
non-existant. You are probably seeing metal flow
lines.

Thanks,

James Wiles

Now I'm really confused, because I'm sure that what I see is on the coin !!

I appreciate all of the responses, they have served to energise me to continue with the coin, I wont stop until its proven to be Metal flow as suggested by coneca US coin rep. James Wiles, or a true overdate and a new discovery !!

Rick

I will try and post up some better pics this afternoon when I get back from work, 4 Hr turn around today !! but I have this one !

Image: DSCF1522~2.jpg
45.27 KB

Thanks
Rick

PS
with this photo, please look in the loop of the 9 and between the 9 and 4, It maybe from me looking at the pics so much, but there appears to be a vey faint 1 crossing the loop of the one and a very faint 9 between .

Thanks again for the comments !!

To me, and I am pretty well convienced, looks like a 5 over 8. Now the photo's have alot to be desired (no offense metalman obviously). My reasoning is simply that if you look closely between the gaps on the 5 you can barely see the circular circle of an 8.. If it were a 3, I believe you would not see that circle of the eight.

We can't tell you what it is, we don't have it in hand. Your pics are good, but just not close enough for us to really see what's going on. If you really love errors, then think about getting a tool to help you. I use a toy, a QX3, think about running to Toys-R-Us and picking one up. They don't make the QX3 anymore, but the QX5 does an even better job.

It takes wonderful pictures and is easy to use...



I would LOVE to see a closeup of your Merc's date this big so we could try to help you.

If you want to send it to me to take the pics for you, I would love to, but that may be way out of your comfort zone. If I can help you in any way, just let me know.