| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,588 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1189 Posts |
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1941-Walkin...AOSws4JW60VAhttp://www.ebay.com/itm/1943-Silver...AOSwAuNW60SJI emailed the seller asking if his coins were cleaned and he gave me a generic response that he doesn't personally clean coins. I then asked specifically about these two and he just said "if I were you I'd stick to certified coins." Needless to say I didn't buy them. The detail looks great but I see some scratches. I still have a lot of problems identifying cleaned coins vs bag scratches in photos. In person it's easier to tell. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
104 Posts |
I think you made the right choice.
It looks like there MAY be cleaning lines on both coins (it looks like in the same place in on the right side of the obverse field). I can't tell for certain as the photos aren't too clear.
I'm certainly not an expert yet, but I would have stayed away as well.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Cant tell on the 41, the photos are just too blurry. The 43 has almost certainly been cleaned. Notice the lack of any consistent luster, breaks in the luster, and general dull appearance usually associated with dipping.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
The images of the coins are too small to tell anything about their originality. Generally these coins have a more frosty appearance when they are left alone. I think that passing was the right thing to do.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1189 Posts |
I've always wondered why someone would clean an uncirculated coin (MS details). If it was mint state to begin with why would you clean it and ruin the value? The detail on those WL coins are great but the scratches on the front indicated a cleaning to me. The sellers response confirmed it for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
The 1941 looks polished. the 1943 looks like it had a dip or two. hard to see on the small pics. I would have passed also.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
He has the light shining on them to take away from the cleaning looks like to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
I think you made the right decision. I have learned that if you are even just a little unsure on ebay auctions, better off to just move on to something else. The only exception is if you can get it for a killer price or it is a difficult to find coin where minor issues might have to be tolerated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1189 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
[Quote]I've always wondered why someone would clean an uncirculated coin (MS details). If it was mint state to begin with why would you clean it and ruin the value?[Quote]
Several reasons:
1. Person is not a collector, ignorant of "condition" and likes shiny things.
2. Person wants to remove unsightly color from uncirculated coin. On Coin Talk recently one uninformed, long-time, well regarded "authority" posted in a thread about "Cleaned or Polished Die" that in his opinion a SE with scratches from a "wipe" was a place where the owner tried to remove the toning! BTW, the toning was "rainbow."
3. Person wishes to hide surface defects or slight amount of "cabinet friction" by eliminating color difference between AU and BU surface.
4. Person is a coin "doctor." Remember there are all degrees of cleaning both abrasive and chemical. Some altered surfaces are virtually undetectable by most dealers and collectors - trust me on this :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1189 Posts |
All valid points, thanks Dipper. I still say cleaned coins drive me nuts. I feel like a majority of raw classic coins on ebay are cleaned and most of the time the seller doesn't disclose it. Even worse, some sellers actually try to hide that a coin is cleaned in order to sell it (angle of the picture, etc). I feel like I see a TON of dipped and cleaned Peace dollars out there.
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
I don't wish to start a "fire" but you are correct. In my experience a large percentage of classic coins (including many of those in slabs)show some evidence of past "cleaning." The term "market acceptable" covers many of these coins (especially those that are in slabs) so it becomes a personal thing. Again, it is a matter of degree (evidence for unoriginality and experience of the viewer). If you don't see something, it is not there! For the most part, the TPGS's set the standards for the coin market. PS Every coin I have purchased (slabbed & raw) on ebay has looked far better in the photo. I expect the worse and ONLY purchase "Cherrypicks" so it does not matter.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
In terms of cleaning, was it once a more acceptable thing to do, say, back in the 60/early 70's? I ask b/c I've heard some older folks, sorry for that, lol, that it was fairly common back then.
Thanks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
In a lot of circles it is still acceptable to do a "quick dip". Go to a auction or antique show and get a consensus, it's kind of mind blowing. I've even heard it from 'pros' at a con show, and I get there point actually; it does improve the look of some nasty looking coins. To bad you risk ruining them forever. Dipper, sounds like you know what your talking about, I gotta ask about your handle   I mean it is funny, right?
Edited by upstate 03/21/2016 1:29 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1247 Posts |
I occasionally buy coins from goldeneaglecoin.com, can't remember, anyway, one day I was looking for an early dime, and the guy had all shiny ones. I asked him if he cleaned the coins (dipped). He said they do that to all the coins they sell online, otherwise people would send them back.
Edited by stampvirgin 03/21/2016 5:26 pm
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,588 |
|