| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,238 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
Hard to say George ms65/66 pics need more magnification. Did you get it at Albany show today? I just picked up 40 original green holder PCGS Morgan's all 64 and 65. Pm me your number again and you can see them sometime this week if you want.
Edited by Imthealphaomega
04/03/2016 5:38 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
431 Posts |
I have better pics but theyre too big even when optomized so I can show you in hand. I got it at the Parsippany, NJ show. I saw, nice morgans. Sure, Ill email you my number.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Photos just not large enough or sharp enough, although the obverse looks fantastic.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
MS64PL
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree pics aren't sharp enough to grade properly - coin appears to have no defects to speak of, and that doesn't seem likely.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
194 Posts |
I bet it's a MS65PL but it looks even better. I think I see a good size hit on the jaw. Louis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Impossible to grade from those photos - could be anywhere from AU-58 to MS-65
|
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
Here are full pics of the slab. Its MS 63 but looks proof like to me.   |
|
Valued Member
United States
121 Posts |
This is a good example of how lighting and angle of the coin in the first obverse photo hides this coins MS-63ness.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
Agreed. Looked at least 64 in earlier photos, but the slab photos look like NGC had the grade correct.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
I agree. I did that to try to show that it looked Proof Like. I agree with MS 63, I just thought it might be proof like. I tried to include these photos just with the grade cropped out but I had problems with the optimizer.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Second set of photos shows the coin much better, I agree with MS63, just shy of a PL designation, close though.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Valued Member
United States
130 Posts |
First photo made it look almost like a MS-67 with no marks at all, basically. Second photos definitely make it seem like a accurate MS-63. Great strike, though.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,238 |
|
Posted 04/03/2016 5:40 pm
