The very first problem when trying to determine value versus overvalued I that even if a coin was attainable, when the value according to the books (ect) goes up, people are more inclined to hoard, and once these coins are removed from circulation - it makes them that much harder to find in the wild - which may lend people into believing that they are more scarce than they really are...
But back to the subject at hand;
My thoughts on overpriced coins...
I feel that slabbed coins, are by a large margin very overpriced. Just because person 'A' is willing to pay a third party $40 to grade their coin which by the book should only be worth $20, doesn't mean it should carry a monstrous premium...
I am only interested in the coin, I don't buy into the slab craze.
It seems to me that a great example of an outright overpriced coin is the 1985 "pointed 5" penny - especially when you consider that most listings of the penny are well circulated examples, all using the MS value, or higher.
(The last guy I spoke to here about getting one wanted something absurd like $11 face value of junk silver - or aprox $132 worth of silver, for one of his (admitted multiple) spare pennies.)
I think that the 1991 non-circulation proof and specimen 1991 sets are overpriced because all those coins were specifically minted for those sets, and the number of circulation grade quarters has no direct correlation to them;
Alternately, even though the uncirculated sets were minted at Ottowa from a totally different run, I can see why they would have a premium for including a quarter which is theoretically circulation quality.
I feel that coins should be determined on two and a half factors;
1) Quantity minted
1.5) Age; because of attrition either due to de-minting, or getting lost ect.
2) Quality of the coin
I was willing to pay a premium for a really nice 1938 silver dollar last month, because I knew that I would have to buy from a dealer, and it was a very nice looking coin.
As I see it, the 1948 Voyageur Dollar clearly falls under supply versus demand - very low mintage, and more people want it that are readily available.
But back to the subject at hand;
My thoughts on overpriced coins...
I feel that slabbed coins, are by a large margin very overpriced. Just because person 'A' is willing to pay a third party $40 to grade their coin which by the book should only be worth $20, doesn't mean it should carry a monstrous premium...
I am only interested in the coin, I don't buy into the slab craze.
It seems to me that a great example of an outright overpriced coin is the 1985 "pointed 5" penny - especially when you consider that most listings of the penny are well circulated examples, all using the MS value, or higher.
(The last guy I spoke to here about getting one wanted something absurd like $11 face value of junk silver - or aprox $132 worth of silver, for one of his (admitted multiple) spare pennies.)
I think that the 1991 non-circulation proof and specimen 1991 sets are overpriced because all those coins were specifically minted for those sets, and the number of circulation grade quarters has no direct correlation to them;
Alternately, even though the uncirculated sets were minted at Ottowa from a totally different run, I can see why they would have a premium for including a quarter which is theoretically circulation quality.
I feel that coins should be determined on two and a half factors;
1) Quantity minted
1.5) Age; because of attrition either due to de-minting, or getting lost ect.
2) Quality of the coin
I was willing to pay a premium for a really nice 1938 silver dollar last month, because I knew that I would have to buy from a dealer, and it was a very nice looking coin.
As I see it, the 1948 Voyageur Dollar clearly falls under supply versus demand - very low mintage, and more people want it that are readily available.



















