....They are 1 cents
Posted 05/21/2016 3:42 pm
Quite a few 1 cents for a single post. I think for future reference, maybe do a post for 3-4 coins at a time. In this case it would have been to split it into 2-3 posts.
From the looks of it, they are in the 63 range. A few nicer ones like that 43, 45, 42 might be a 64. The 1951 is scratched so much it'll be commented on. I'd say a 63 scratch.
ICCS does look for clean fields more than they look at the devices. But they also do most of their grading on the obverse (so I've been told). In your case, the reverses' are really nice (as most are for George VI), but the obverses have a few marks.
Hope this helps
From the looks of it, they are in the 63 range. A few nicer ones like that 43, 45, 42 might be a 64. The 1951 is scratched so much it'll be commented on. I'd say a 63 scratch.
ICCS does look for clean fields more than they look at the devices. But they also do most of their grading on the obverse (so I've been told). In your case, the reverses' are really nice (as most are for George VI), but the obverses have a few marks.
Hope this helps
