| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,418 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
530 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3656 Posts |
Close again from what I can see.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Close. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Note the location of the 'M': Center = Wide AM. Off center = close AM
Edited by coop 05/26/2016 5:42 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
530 Posts |
They are both 1995's.You rarely see a Close AM with this much space inbetween the A and M.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
both are corroded and it's thinning the devices. Only worry about Close/Wide AMs on 92, 98, 99, and 2000
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2403 Posts |
I agree. While I don't collect LMC This is one error I do look for. This one is a Close AM
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: Only worry about Close/Wide AMs on 92, 98, 99, and 2000 Right, if there does happen to be a WAM out there on some other date after 93 other than 98, 99, or 2000, just let someone else make the discovery.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
I thought there was a 96 too.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
There was one mentioned once, but was mysterious stolen. It was probably an altered Wide AM with the 1996 obverse taken from a different coin. I guess we will never know now.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Oh yeah, I remember now. I have it on my list. I always check them, just in case.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,418 |
|