Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1942-D LWC Pre Or Post Strike Lamination?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,694Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
SjlundCoin's Avatar
United States
534 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2016  1:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SjlundCoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is a post strike. If it were a pre strike lamination then the flaking part wouldn't be there. It would have already fallen off before the strike. Yours still has the flaking part on the coin so it would have to be a post strike.
Pillar of the Community
Pete2226's Avatar
United States
3331 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2016  2:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Pete2226 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I do not really understand why the flake would have to fall off before the strike.

I did find a comment on one of the CCF threads which suggested that the opposite face of the coin opposite the feature would be a bit weakly struck in a pre strike lamination. Mine is not, so I am now leaning the other direction - towards a post strike lamination.
Edited by Pete2226
06/19/2016 3:07 pm
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2016  3:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It would be post strike. The peel loosened later. If it happened pre-strike, then we would not see the displacement of the lamination. It would be straight on the rim area.
Pillar of the Community
Pete2226's Avatar
United States
3331 Posts
 Posted 06/19/2016  3:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Pete2226 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If it happened pre-strike, then we would not see the displacement of the lamination. It would be straight on the rim area.


Helpful! Thanks!
Pillar of the Community
Pete2226's Avatar
United States
3331 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2016  4:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Pete2226 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have had someone suggest to me that this is a folded over rim burr. I have not hear of rim burrs, much less folded over.

Does anyone have any comments about that?

Does anyone have a link to a resource on rim burrs I could read?

Does anyone have an image of a rim burr they could post?

Thanks for any help!
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2016  7:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Here is a link on finning on Mike Diamond's web site:
http://www.error-ref.com/?s=finning
The fin is very small in the image. But when the raise off the rim, then circulation can flatten them.
  Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 2,694Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums