Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

US Mint Qc Getting Lax?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 998Next Topic  
New Member
wbryan09's Avatar
United States
32 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2008  8:49 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add wbryan09 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Has any one else noticed the lax QC and manufacturing standards with the newer coins and packaging? Yesterday I received a good sized and long awaited order of Presidential dollar sets both BU and proof, silver proof sets, and BU mint sets.

One of the Presidential proof set holders actually popped open in my hand as I was taking it from the sleeve! I'm not joking, if I hadn't been quick the coins would have hit the floor. If I hadn't been lucky I'd have autographed a handful of my new proof dollars. I proceeded to looked through each package very carefully and found 2 others that were not completely snapped together. The sets do not even approximate being sealed or airtite.

After looking at the fields on the proofs under low magnification they look significantly less than pristine! I compared some older sets (10-15yrs) and it looks as though the surface prep on the older coins is far better. Not to mention the packaging is far superior. I've been seeing what I thought was more lax QC for some years, but these 2007 items are a little disappointing! There's no doubt that the really high grade population (PF and MS) on these newer coins is going to be far lower than in years past.

Anyone else seeing the same type of things?
Edited by wbryan09
02/25/2008 9:09 pm
Valued Member
Eyeluvcoins's Avatar
United States
186 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2008  9:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Eyeluvcoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, I agree, the so called quality control seems to be lacking. Just check out the half dollar (part of the 3 coin proof bald eagle set) I returned for replacement (see attachment).

They charge exhorbatant amounts for these so-called low mintage coins, but, then it seems they never truely go through quality control per se.

I'll keep ordering them though, just because I love the coins and don't want to purchase them from the even more enflated prices on E-Bay !

Laura





Image: US-Mint-Qc-Getting-Lax? IMG_1308_1.jpg
84.79 KB
New Member
wbryan09's Avatar
United States
32 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2008  11:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wbryan09 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, the Presidential proofs I received have numerous hairlines and what almost appear to be lint marks, very similar to your photo. However the issue with the poorly sealed cases is simply inexcusable!
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187702 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2008  10:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I posted my comment in another somewhat related thread:

https://goccf.com/t/25992&whichpage=2

But I meant to put it in this one!

So, I will summarize: The Mint is making way too many coins to keep up with QC. The more they make, with special series issues and all, the worse the quality will be.
Pillar of the Community
eaglefoot's Avatar
United States
6326 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2008  1:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eaglefoot to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If no one complains to them and sends back stuff......NOTHING will be done....and nothing may be done anyway. There's little choice for the consumer to change this. Their sales aren't going to be affected much I'm guessing, but the numbers of returned merchandise and complaints would probably be the only small chance to get them to pay attention to "QC". Firing people and inspecting MORE products and hiring people who care about their job would be nice.
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 998Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums