Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

How Can This Be An MS 65.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 3,543Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
1cent's Avatar
Canada
1051 Posts
 Posted 08/13/2016  4:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1cent to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Based on the fields, it's a 65 by the ICCS grading method. Certainly not the first 65 I've seen with a nasty mark on the effigy or hidden in the legend.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts
 Posted 08/13/2016  5:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TheCoinHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I find coins that already exhibit a duller / toned finish are more susceptible to photograph poorly through plastic therefore amplifying the negative effect. Here is an example of a 66 and a 65 both ICCS graded MS-65. I think most would say that the 65 has better eye appeal.

How-Can-This-Be-An-MS-65.
How-Can-This-Be-An-MS-65.
How-Can-This-Be-An-MS-65.
How-Can-This-Be-An-MS-65.

Edited by TheCoinHunter
08/13/2016 5:25 pm
Pillar of the Community
oriole's Avatar
Canada
5253 Posts
 Posted 08/13/2016  5:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add oriole to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Such unattractive toning (tarnish would be a better word) on the 1966. I would not care much for it. Better a nice PL set from the same year.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts
 Posted 08/14/2016  1:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TheCoinHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
So in this case I would probably agree on the lack of eye appeal but mostly because of the obverse on the 66. I personally much prefer toned (or tarnished) coins. To me, they posses much more "character" and tend to be far more interesting than a blast white example. I have over 100 66 PL sets on hand...The all look the same to me...
Bedrock of the Community
sel_69l's Avatar
Australia
21788 Posts
 Posted 08/15/2016  12:28 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add sel_69l to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
"How Can This Be an MS65?"
clearly,
it's not.
Pillar of the Community
trout1105's Avatar
Australia
7096 Posts
 Posted 08/15/2016  10:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add trout1105 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That bottom coin looks like it would struggle to make MS62 let alone MS65
  Previous TopicReplies: 21 / Views: 3,543Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums