| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 3,090 |
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
Wow, this is quite the first post! Three raw key cents!! Welcome to CCF! I really like the 1909s IHC. If they're fakes they're good, but the 77 IHC and 09 LWC do have condition issues. It would help to take pics out of the 2x2s; the markers we need to see would be clearer. Thanks for sharing!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5079 Posts |
They all appear to be genuine from the pics. Nice haul! All the biggies in one shot!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
946 Posts |
All appear to be the real deal. The 1909-s Indian seems to be the only one that hasn't been cleaned as well. 1877 Good details 1909-s Vg8 1909s-s VDB VF deatails
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
Thanks all. I'm having a heck of a time proving that they aren't real...so, that leads to a good buy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
1877 - couple of items that make me wonder. #1 - overall condition. #2 - 8, 7, & 7 in the date do not look right. Top of the 8 has something going on. First seven spacing from the 8 is too far and too close to the second 7. Reverse - damage? on the N in ONE. From PCGS website, "On a genuine coin, the bottom right of the N in ONE and the top left of the N in CENT should be much weaker than the rest of the denomination. The only set of dies used on mint state coins issued for general circulation in 1877 has this distinct characteristic." and....."On the counterfeit coin presented here, note that the bottom of the serif on the second 7 is not squared off like the first. Both 7s on the genuine coin have squared-off serifs." Would send all three to a TPG for verification.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I think they're all genuine, but given the condition of the '77 and the SVDB, I hope you got a very good deal - these might prove difficult to sell in the future.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Oh, and -  to the CCF!
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
I took a closer look at all three coins using a higher magnification device. All three appear to be real. Acloco, the photo I placed on my post is not the best for the 1877. Under higher magnification, the 7's are full and in the correct positions relative to the 8. Top of the 8 looks off on the photo, lighting or something. Both 'N' are weak in the correct spots. Both 7's are squared off. So, I think I have the real deal there. Thanks for the feedback.
The 1909 S VDB has the tell tale die chip in the upper loop of the S. So, that one is real also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
Send in for authentication will be your best bet now and in the future.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
968 Posts |
Congrats on the key dates!
I don't think they will be difficult to sell in the future as these are all high demand coins and collectors at the lower end of the financial spectrum would be happy to get these key dates in any condition. However, you can't get the same price for them that problem free versions of the coins in the same grade would command.
I agree with acloco about sending them in for authentication. I'd even talk to the dealer you bought them from about sending them in through him and would he refund your money if any aren't authentic. You'd have more leverage if you did it right when you bought it, but if he is a respectable dealer I'd hope he'd still stand behind the coins he sells. The only issue is you may have to send them to ANACS as I don't know if NGC and PCGS would slab the problem coins. I'm not an expert on that so if someone with knowledge contradicts me then believe them.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Sweet! to CCF!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
 Three genuine coins The 1877 is Fair details, damaged obverse and reverse, cleaned. The 1909-S IHC is VG/VG+, close to Fine. The 1909 S VDB Lincoln looks VF details, harshly cleaned. That being said, the 2nd 9 is correctly curved, 9's are open, and the 1 is non-serif, as expected. Wheat tips are not blunted, the left upright of the N is parallel with the left edge of the B in VDB; Looks like die pair #3.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
New Member
 United States
5 Posts |
Thanks gang...good advice and apprecriate the feedback. Nice to see a bunch of experts on here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
Given the number of Chinese fakes that are on the market, I would never buy any of these coins raw as a collector. When I was dealer, which was over five years ago, I did buy them raw if I was sure they were good. In the old days, the fakes used to be somewhat "high grade," but of late the Chinese have been messing the their products so that they might get "details," problem grades. They have fooled the major grading company with this stuff within the past year. I don't care for the 1877 cent. The digits in the date don't look right to me. The loops in the "8" should be the same on both sides, and they don't look to be. The "7s" appear to be too close together. Also the bottom of the "N" in "CENT" is weak on all business stikes of that date. Your piece has been damaged in that area which makes it impossible to tell its status. The 1909-S Indian cent might be okay. I can't really find anything wrong with it. The 1909-S-VDB cent looks odd to me. The crossbar on the "B" in "VDB" should be diagonal, not horizontal. It seems to be weak or missing on your piece. Also there is a little "Chinese corrosion" on the "G" and "O" in "GOD." The Chinese have been "aging" their bronze fakes of late with toning and corrosion, and the Chinese corrosion that I have seen has had that color. Sorry I can't be more positive.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 3,090 |
|