Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Mexico 1872 Scale Peso. Error Coin Or Forgery?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 4,927Next Topic  
Valued Member
cara's Avatar
Uruguay
217 Posts
 Posted 09/06/2016  6:46 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add cara to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This coin seems to have the correct SG and weight, but the struck has many irregularities: The denticles on obverse, weak struck "UN PESO Mo M. 902,7" and the edge reeds are strange. Is this a Forgery?

Weight: 26.97 gs.
Diameter: 37.7 mm
SG: 10.33


Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?


Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?

Mexico-1872-Scale-Peso.-Error-Coin-Or-Forgery?
Pillar of the Community
0xDA71D's Avatar
United States
1215 Posts
 Posted 09/06/2016  8:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 0xDA71D to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think Swamperbob will chime in, but in my opinion, this is absolutely a counterfeit, and likely a modern one to fool collectors. The "Libertad" text font just looks wrong, and the reverse rim is off.
New Member
United States
47 Posts
 Posted 09/06/2016  10:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add xlrcable to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To me the strangest thing is between 8 and 9 o'clock on the eagle side, where the denticles seem to stray away from the rim. If that can be explained as an off-center strike, then I don't see anything else that screams counterfeit to me. But I'm anxious to see what others think.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1666 Posts
 Posted 09/06/2016  11:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Numismat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
First impression - struck from a well worn die, harshly cleaned with an abrasive like toothpaste or silver polish and banged up a bit around the edges. As for the dentils splitting from the rim, I've seen that on these coins before. It's a bit more extreme on this coin, but that may be the die wear.
Valued Member
cara's Avatar
Uruguay
217 Posts
 Posted 09/08/2016  12:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cara to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Could the obverse off-center explain the lines and poor struck on reverse legends? Is this a bifurcation example? It is more pronunciated near the dentils splitting from the rim.
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 09/08/2016  4:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If you look at UN PESO at the top of the letters they are dis-formed due to this so-called bifurcation effect as cara has alluded to in the previous post. Hard to imagine a cast die transfer process bringing this over with such detail? Unfortunately I do not know enough of this coin to determine if its a fake. Error Collector experts like to call these errors particularly in modern coins as severe flow lines created from severely worn dies. As the die ages, the cold metal flow from striking planchets will groove the die face in a radial pattern. I remember writing about this in a paper for U.S. Colonial coins in a ANS-COAC Conference on the Atlee Broken A Letter punch. Sometimes this bifurcation effect or outward radial flow lines effect the dies to a point as to create an incorrect assumption in that a new die variety exist due to letter or numeral dis-forming in the die or maybe in this case thinking this is a modern forgery or contemporary circulating counterfeit.

http://www.error-ref.com/radial-flow-lines/

John Lorenzo
Numismatist
United States
Valued Member
cara's Avatar
Uruguay
217 Posts
 Posted 09/08/2016  4:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cara to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting website, colonialjohn !!

Could misplacement of the silver planchet create this bifurcation effect?
Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 10/07/2016  12:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know of any counterfeiting process that'd result in those very fine, minute flow lines out ner the rim. Also, an 1872 Mo is hardly worth the effort faking, at least in the proper composition as the weight and specific gravity indicate. The deformation of the edge could be the result of its having been hurled to the pavement to test its ring, once a common practice south of the border. The flan may have been a bit oversized and/or irregular. I've seen some weird things with this genre that certainly would make you wonder. That said, my impression is genuine but struck with a cap side die in a quite advanced state of wear.

Colligo ergo sum
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 10/07/2016  9:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
With no doubt whatsoever it is a numismatic forgery - a torn mold. These are centrifugal castings in my opinion.
Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 10/08/2016  01:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
With no doubt whatsoever it is a numismatic forgery - a torn mold. These are centrifugal castings in my opinion.


You're the expert in such matters. I'll admit that it'd probably have fooled me. I'd simply remark that it seems like the effort would've been better spent forging an issue worth more than just a few dollars over melt, as this would be in its apparent condition if genuine.

Colligo ergo sum
Valued Member
cara's Avatar
Uruguay
217 Posts
 Posted 10/08/2016  12:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cara to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
What I do not understand is why the counterfeiter allowed certain suspects details, like the rim off center, instead of hiding them.
The coin has many hits on edge, many doubts of people along time about his authenticity?
There is a deep scratch on the right side of the neck eagle. Could somebody have made it for a silver test?
New Member
United States
47 Posts
 Posted 10/09/2016  7:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add xlrcable to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'd like to learn something from this thread but I confess I am not sure what specific details give away the casting. I'm also not familiar with the term bifurcation effect?
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 10/09/2016  10:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If you look at the Mintmark Mo), assayer(M) and 902.7 you will see radial lines coming off the top of these letters. As the dies wear down this effect worsens and does lead to a defacement of the lettering and numeral motifs. It was introduced IMO by Jim Spilman in the Colonial Newsletter around two decades ago originally used as a geologic term. I talked about in this publication:

https://nnp.wustl.edu/library/book/512501

ANS COAC Publication - Atlee broken A letter punch which refutes Walter Breen's mechanism of classifying certain Colonial Coppers to certain mints by using shared letter punches as a fingerprinting attribution tool.

In terms of it being a cast I do not know enough of this type to give an opinion if its cast, struck or a modern forgery. I always prefer the coin in hand and then to a laboratory. But sometimes this is not possible as the owner of this coin is in Uruguay. If cast its of a modern casting process - that is for sure.

John Lorenzo
Numismatist
United States

Edited by colonialjohn
10/09/2016 10:57 pm
New Member
United States
47 Posts
 Posted 10/10/2016  3:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add xlrcable to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Interesting - thank you!
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 4,927Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.41 seconds to rattle this change. Forums