Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2016 To 2017 Toonie Detail Comparison Differences?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 33 / Views: 7,305Next Topic
Page: of 3
Valued Member
KoolKat's Avatar
Canada
210 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  1:46 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add KoolKat to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Detail differences, there seems to be a few. After studying the details on my "found", 2017 coin, and after consulting and discussing this item, with my local coin shop professionals. at Canada Collectibles, We did some side by side comparisons and did seem to find some more fuller detail in a few areas of the hair . (see pics),Regular 2016 toonie on the left, my coin is on the right, take note in the first pic, 2016-To-2017-Toonie-Detail-Comparison-Differences?the front hair detail seems fuller! In the second pic,
2016-To-2017-Toonie-Detail-Comparison-Differences?also shows more details in the hair on the 2017 toonie Moving ahead to the third picture,
2016-To-2017-Toonie-Detail-Comparison-Differences?we seen what might seem a pointier maple leaf, seems to look different.Could someone please explain to me, how a worn coin can have more detail that a BU one? Thanks.


Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  3:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add john100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
As you mentioned the 2017 was found in a park setting where the toonie could be reacting to like lawn fertilizers or other minor elements to feed the grass
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9865 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  3:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I just looked with my loupe at a 2016 toonie I had in my pocket.
It has all the hair detail of your 2017 and more.
The 2016 in your pic is either weakly struck or from a worn die.
Not a very professional comparison.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
Valued Member
KoolKat's Avatar
Canada
210 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  3:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KoolKat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well,these are just opinions, not set in stone, This is the main reason for starting this thread,I totally welcome any observations, or opinions , and agree, as well, I am NOT an expert. I used two different toonie sources to compare with, I guess both sources were weak strikes. I don`t have vast resources at my disposal, all I have is my eyes and a couple of pictures really. That is why I am sending the coin to CCCS, they said if they could verify the coin as authentic, and not a fabrication, they will slab the coin, with the date in the description! When I receive it back, I will gladly post the slabbed coin, in the meantime I opened my own thread on this coin to dig deeper into the mystery, and totally welcome any observations, or opinions, even if they are wrong.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9865 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  3:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe your coin is real.
I see nothing to indicate it is counterfeit.
You do yourself and your coin a disservice by posting unprofessional "professional" comparisons.
An opinion by CCCS is worthwhile.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
Valued Member
KoolKat's Avatar
Canada
210 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  4:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KoolKat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
yes, your right, the hard science, of a true grading company, will tell the tale I thought I was on to some differences though, the examples I used to checked with were BU coins, but both must have been either weak strikes, or worn dies, and threw me off! I have to be sure, try and figure this out. I highly respect the senior members here , and their opinions, especially yours, and some others,who have had vast experience with numismatics , and all the hard science that it entails.But, there is, it seems certain members here, that purposly antagonige, and critistize. So, I would like to say, at this point that, There is no fire under me from anybody to get me to take my item down, or whatever else I plan to do with it, I am acting on advice from my professional coin friends, who are as stumped as all of us on this, Thanks again DBM
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  4:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add john100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would even suggest that you save the 50 bucks or so for slabbing right now, if the RCM produces any polar bear desgn toonie in 17 , you have a 2.00 coin, if they don't you probably have a neat trial piece. CCCS probably if not counterfeit will just slab 2017 toonie au 50 or so and the date but the most important fact is what design the RCM has in production for 2017, hope you have a rare trial piece.
Pillar of the Community
ace_ftw's Avatar
Canada
1747 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  5:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ace_ftw to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I doubt they wont make the polar bear toonie. just like 99/2000 there were still regular caribou quarters, or with the mass of Olympic quarters there were still caribous as well.

even if the polar bear is only made for circulation sets, it will most likely still be produced for 2017.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  5:37 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wildflowerAB to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Koolkat, if this were my MD find and I lived anywhere near Winnipeg, I'd do some investigating into how this 2017 might have came to be, just to satisfy my own curiosity. Maybe take a Winnipeg mint tour, find a name of someone who's in the know and then ask some questions. Surely they're able to tell you for what purpose have 2017 polar bear toonies already been minted?

Because regardless of differences between the 2016 and 2017 toonie, a couple of thoughts:

What matters most is comparison to a 2017 Toonie and of course they haven't been released yet. It's highly unlikely that the Queen's hair would be touched up in 2017 considering the current effigy has been around ever since 2003.

You might want to find out if both versions - polar bear and 150th anniversary - are going to be released into general circulation in 2017? Or will any of the numerous collector sets that the mint cranks out (baby, Xmas, uncirculated, wedding, etc) contain steel plated 2017 polar bear toonies?

2016-To-2017-Toonie-Detail-Comparison-Differences?

Without you having done any digging, whether you found anything special on the ground seems to be totally up in the air. (Forgive the pun!) Particularly if you're to sell it, do you recall the 2016 mismatched Uncirculated Sets? That a 2015 loonie was included in some sets was authenticated by RCM publicly acknowledging their mistake because some recipients brought it to the attention of the mint. Otherwise natural scepticism may have prevailed, belief that all the sets had been tampered with and resealed.

But something important to consider --- even if 2017 polar bear toonies are never issued, because the core of a toonie reportedly can be popped out, it wouldn't be entirely surprising if there's a proliferation of 2017 polar bear toonie "errors" next year which would diminish any interest in a legitimate one, especially one that's not in mint state. To create such an error, virtually anyone could take two toonies next year and combine a 2017 outer rim with a past year polar bear core.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  5:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Alan to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for starting this thread, I find this to be intriguing!

Still hoping that a KoolKat from the future left it in the field for the present day KoolKat!

Keep digging, don't let the negativity get to you:)
Valued Member
KoolKat's Avatar
Canada
210 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  5:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add KoolKat to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
for what purpose have 2017 polar bear toonies already been minted?
That is some of the best advice I have got yet, Thank you so much WildflowerAB. That is brilliant, I am going to take a tour, and ask some key questions to certain employees! and thanks Allen LOL Pretty sure I`ll get some answers. thank you
Edited by KoolKat
09/15/2016 5:55 pm
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  6:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Alan to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Almost as if your core is missing electro plating, completely lacking in any reflection, I noticed that in your first pics. Some interesting doubling on the brow and nose of yours too, prob Machine Doubling.

Can anyone explain the dies used for striking a bimetallic coin? I assume each one is one piece like normal? Not much info out there on bimetallic coin striking. what's the mechanism that pushes the ring and core into the chamber?

Is it possible this is a mule? I would think it not to be impossible that they would strike 2017's now, however, I still find it strange that this coin was struck months ago due to enviro damage.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  6:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add john100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Like any manufacturing plant, you crank out trial pieces as in washers or what ever to set up machinery before full production, likely the RCM does the same, if you tour RCM Winnipeg, it's a rather large manufacturing plant, coins are dropped all over the floor one can assume this coin was dropped and a worker flipped it into a 2016 bulk bin or as I said something cool happened and your the lucky one
Edited by john100
09/15/2016 6:46 pm
Pillar of the Community
M_d_in_guy's Avatar
Canada
1049 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  6:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add M_d_in_guy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It was mentioned earlier about the cores being switched out, it might be almost impossible to get exact alignment between the two doing this, only speculation on my part, but if this 2017 has perfect alignment between the outer ring and the core and no others show up that way, then it would be safe to say this was an intentional minting?

Very cool and great find. Hope it works out for you.
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  7:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add john100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If the RCM mints like a baby raccoon core type coin with the same outer ring one can see maybe someone can fake this coin if it's unique. A few months down the road if the RCM doesn't produce a 2017 polar bear coin, then you send it to PCGS and chuck it on a major auction and let us go at it, unless you collect toonies. If you look up Mr. Glassford's site it will show the locking device for the two piece toonie, you see ever so often someone trying to sell a toonie with the core reversed, it can't happen due to the way the coin is struck, someone has popped the core and reset them.
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10459 Posts
 Posted 09/15/2016  7:30 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
...the hard science, of a true grading company...


There is nothing even remotely scientific, with respect to any Canadian grading company... you are paying for opinions, nothing more.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
  Previous TopicReplies: 33 / Views: 7,305Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Forums