| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,638 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
288 Posts |
Of course the photo picks up on the chatter on the neck. A real stunner in hand.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
The fields look pretty clean, I think ICCS would go 65 on this.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 Beauty!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
I thinks this coin looks better in hand. I love toning like this. 65 for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
867 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
288 Posts |
Results will be posted later today.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Trying to grade through plastic.  ..MS-64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
395 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
288 Posts |
Time for the big reveal: it's a 65. Really difficult to appreciate it through these lousy pictures.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
I've had a couple of 65 george VI quarters before and I can tell what you mean. It has a really nice strong look in hand but never comes out in my pics either. Especially through plastic
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
867 Posts |
For us that guessed "MS65," the photos were just fine. I bet it does look much nicer in hand though.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,638 |
|