I don't believe the Graders themselves put the prints on the coins otherwise the grades given would have been higher.
These 25mm silver proofs usually grade between PR68-PR70 with PR69 being the usual grade achieved and about 10% making PR70.
The highest grade out the 10 of these coins submitted was PR68 and the lowest was PR66, This is telling me that the coins were "Mishandled" somewhere between being received and being graded as the coins were flawless when I sent them in.
I truly think that the prints were put on the coins somewhere in the chain between receiving the coins and them being graded.
I have had well over a thousand coins graded by PCGS and if the graders not wearing gloves was causing this fingerprint problem then I would have had a lot more problem submissions.
In this case something has gone horribly wrong between PCGS receiving my coins and the grading room, Remember the coins sit there for quite some time before they finally get graded.
These 25mm silver proofs usually grade between PR68-PR70 with PR69 being the usual grade achieved and about 10% making PR70.
The highest grade out the 10 of these coins submitted was PR68 and the lowest was PR66, This is telling me that the coins were "Mishandled" somewhere between being received and being graded as the coins were flawless when I sent them in.
I truly think that the prints were put on the coins somewhere in the chain between receiving the coins and them being graded.
I have had well over a thousand coins graded by PCGS and if the graders not wearing gloves was causing this fingerprint problem then I would have had a lot more problem submissions.
In this case something has gone horribly wrong between PCGS receiving my coins and the grading room, Remember the coins sit there for quite some time before they finally get graded.



















