| Author |
Replies: 29 / Views: 2,673 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Just FYI. I am looking at the LIBERTY and the feather detail, and I see VG-10. I look at the reverse and see something between VG-10 and F-12. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
In the old days, it took a full "LIBERTY" to reach the Fine grade. Some of the letters could be weak or only outlined, but they needed to be there.
The grading services have changed that and pushed things down a notch. It's not right, but it's what they did probably to please some dealers with an "instant profit" for a "found" upgrade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
Quote: In the old days, it took a full "LIBERTY" to reach the Fine grade I agree .. in the old days a full LIBERTY was needed, but now that has changed. The way I hear it .. I called and talked with ANACS on this. The LIBERTY can be weak, due to strike. TPG's are now assigning a grade based on wear details for more than just LIBERTY. ---------------------- For the OP's coin there is still some details on the feather tips. I think if you blocked out LIBERTY and looked at the rest of the coin .. it looks like a easy Fine or better coin. For Indian Head cents, it is sort of like the diamonds. You can have BU+ coins with four diamonds or the same grade BU+ coin with less than four diamonds. And both can be the same grade. Same for Full band Mercury dimes, we don't say, "To be a MS 64 Mercury dime you have to have full bands" The whole coin is graded,
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
Quote:The way I hear it .. I called and talked with ANACS on this. The LIBERTY can be weak, due to strike. TPG's are now assigning a grade based on wear details for more than just LIBERTY. In the words of the late Frank Barone from "Everybody loves Raymond," "What a lot of cr*p!" Yes, some dates are better struck than others, but you are supposed to be an expert grader, you should know which ones fall into that category, or it should be in the corporate information source.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
i have the obverse at VG10 and reverse at F12. I'm going to say they gave it F12 as the obverse is just a hair better than 10
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5837 Posts |
I would guess that they gave a grade of F-15, TPGraders are human and I'm sure after looking at hundreds, if not thousands, they did let a few go above the norm at end of week.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The keys usually get preferential treatment, so I suppose F-12, but it reads VG-10 to me with 3+ letters showing in Liberty.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
By the circulation looks VG-10. But I'd be in the F-12 camp for a guess for PCGS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12057 Posts |
 PCGS F12. There's a story behind this post. I've been looking for a lower grade but relatively problem free 1909-S to fill the last hole in my circulated IHC Dansco, either raw or to crack out of a slab. While browsing ebay, this coin showed up. The bid level at the time was, in my opinion, quite low for the TPG-assigned grade, without much interest, and that immediately got me wondering why, so I took a good look at the coin, and came to the conclusion that by my (20+ year old) grading standards I would grade this coin around VG10, as I did not feel that it had sufficient obverse detail -- especially in LIBERTY -- to merit a full Fine grade, despite good eye appeal and a slightly better reverse. My thought was this would probably be a perfect VG10 for a green CAC, but thinking it was a bit overgraded at Fine 12, I passed on bidding. This coin ended up selling for $347, which is a low sale price for a problem free PCGS graded example in any VG or F grade, and now I'm wondering if my grading standards were perhaps a bit too strict when I had this coin at a VG10 and if I erred in thinking it was overgraded by PCGS. This date and MM have been selling for $375-$425 consistently in problem-free VG+/F slabs when you can find one that's reasonably accurately graded. It is interesting to see that CCF thinks this coin (in the first post) is anywhere from VG8 to F15, with an outlier VF grade. That's a grading window that historically was fairly clearly defined, but now seems to be rather murky, and I am at a loss as to why this is the case. Compare it to this PCGS F12 1909-S IHC from another seller which was at $380 yesterday, and which I would grade at G4 to G6 by my standards (and which the seller is probably going to be stuck with forever):  
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
As I'm from the old school you know I didn't grade this IHC F-12 for the simple reason of LIBERTY . Now your telling me about TPG being lenient with this issue and over grading our old standards . That's ok , but all my IHC's are raw . I grade all of my coins myself . So now I'll have to go through the Indians again because I probably UNDER GRADED them . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote:Compare it to this PCGS F12 1909-S IHC from another seller which was at $380 yesterday, and which I would grade at G4 to G6 by my standards (and which the seller is probably going to be stuck with forever) The grading on that one might be a mechanical/clerical error. The same seller has another 1909-S Indian in PCGS F12 with a cert number 1 digit off from this one. There is a huge difference between the 2 coins but the seller is asking the same price for both! This one looks like a G06: http://www.ebay.com/itm/14217341694...RK:MEBIDX:ITThis one I can see as an F12: http://www.ebay.com/itm/14217223210...RK:MEBIDX:ITSomething went wrong at PCGS with this submission.
|
| |
Replies: 29 / Views: 2,673 |