Another Example Of (Imhp ) What I Deem To Be An Ugly Coin

Or it could have been the first bid he made in the last 90 days.

I hate bidders like 0***o who always bid up the item because they have to be on top.

What I'm saying is the bidder who upped the bid from $3,300 to $3975 has 100% bid activity with this seller. Meaning that he only bids on this sellers coins(unusual). The account might actually be the seller, or a friend of the seller, that uses this ebay account to artificially inflate the prices at his auctions.

So you're saying that having a 100% bid activity with the same seller isn't unusual? I strongly disagree.

I'll redact that. I see what you're saying. It only shows his 30 day history.

I agree. I thought I cleared this up with my last post. Once upon a time on ebay, when a buyer would come in with a substantially larger bid (percentagewise)in an auction and their history disclosed that 100% of their bids were with the same seller, it was considered to be a red flag. I understand now that times have apparently changed.




I agree and it's a great informative thread. Even the bidding argument was informative for users. I'm sorry if I spoiled it for some.

Maybe he upped the price and put a Make an Offer in it rather than run another auction. I think it probably should sell close to 60 money which is $4,000, but it should have mint luster to be a 58 and I can't see it from the photos.

How did the auction end with a winner and now the same seller has the coin in a 2nd listing?

I think a natural build up of patina, or "crust" as some call it, can make a coin very attractive, such as the coins here. The Seated dollar in question,looks like it's been cleaned, and although it appears to retain some darker toning, the surfaces do not look natural.







ET