| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,010 |
|
Valued Member
Canada
112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
From your pictures I can't tell very well but it'll go XF or AU.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1691 Posts |
Full horn and hair ribbons w/ nose ticks
AU-55 IMHO
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
AU-58 would be my guess.
Nice!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Suggest true photos rather than scans for the best input. Your coin appears rather bland in these washed-out images - I'll bet it's much nicer than it appears.
Edited by Coinfrog
12/03/2016 6:28 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Take frogs advise on scans. It's tough enough to get or give honest evaluations with photos only.
This is very close to mint state, but not quite.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
112 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18712 Posts |
less light is better. the reflective light is washing out the actual surfaces and the amount of luster remaining cannot be determined.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
I am in at AU55.
Some better pictures may help - but I think I see enough to say this is not MS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I'm in the AU range. I can't tell how much luster is left.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
If you're scanning a coin, it never seems to show the true condition, if you can...show us a photo most members are saying AU+ and such but, I believe the coin is in a mint state condition just trying to get it somewhat right..  |
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,010 |
Posted 12/03/2016 4:20 pm
