| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 2,389 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
280 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Yeah the AU53 grade above sounds good. I could see it going 50 also but the reverse looks better than 50 by a touch. Either way it's a sweet chunk of historical American gold.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1963 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3234 Posts |
The "8" in the date looks strange. Are you sure it's authentic?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36883 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
I was originally thinking 53, but now that practically EVERYONE said that, ill say 53+ 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
AU-50. Perhaps a rim ding at "ST in "STATES" ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18714 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
280 Posts |
The obverse has lots of luster, way better than you'd expect, and some cartwheel. The reverse is even better, looks like it's got full mint luster, looks like full cartwheel.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
From the above photo, I'd agree with most in AU 53.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 2,389 |
|