| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,193 |
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Any chance of getting a better quality picture of the "FG"
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4406 Posts |
It doesn't look like a CAM to me, a better pic of the FG would determine if it is or not.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
891 Posts |
I think it is a WAM the A in between the T's in States is centered, and the FG looks pretty close
Edited by oldmike 01/10/2017 7:50 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
281 Posts |
Definitely agree with Wide AM. Good luck with future searches.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
Takes all three PUP's to confirm. Have seen the space between the AM vary in spacing as some dies aged. The other two PUP's seem to suggest WAM. Thanks, Doug.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
It is a WAM for sure I agree
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The location of the 'FG' is like the Wide AM (RDV-006): 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
282 Posts |
Here is much better angle of view of FG. Other picture was just mistaken to post that way. Bad angle bad and bad lighting. I beg, please take another look @ "FG". I think you might just might be able to better see how wide it really is. Ehhh? And I'm retrieving another pic representing "States" to see the activity between a and t is correct I'm pretty sure there is a lien and show also closeness if I can capture. Okay and I found one for States from edited current pic. You can see the activity is purely there. In the bottom leg with a better angle but I can see real time when I take a look. Movement is there. Hope you see but I'm trying to show. Hopefully it should easily clear up I think this year. I feel all attributes are there that's needed to fulfill requirements. I know States it's hard to tell sometimes. But I think it can be seen here. And the FG I think also shows better angle here. Thanks take a good look here and I appreciate it thanks again. Come on man do it for me make it happen      
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
282 Posts |
Sorry for those duplicates. I guess twice the chance to help you make up your mind. Wish me luck
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5964 Posts |
Sorry Joey, it is what it is. It's a WAM. Better luck on the next one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I can see the cross bar on the 'G' which the RDV-006 has. The RDV-007 does not have the cross bar.  So your coin is a RDV-006, normal for that year. sorry
Edited by coop 01/11/2017 11:06 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1781 Posts |
Your newer pics of the FG suggest WAM. Your pic of the AME shows an AM that "seems" far closer together than the ME which s somewhat bothersome to me. The photos are just not good enough to use this as a marker. Your images of the FG could also be much better but the later ones in particular seem damaging to it being a CAM. Get better images and try again but based on what I see in your later pics of the FG I don't know that it will help but it can't hurt. Nonetheless, why not just compare to another 1982 cent and a 1983? That should nail it on your end without the bother of taking more pics.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I know he meant 1992 and 1993 cents.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
Not a CAM, certainly the normal WAM for the year
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,193 |