| Author |
Replies: 26 / Views: 6,581 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Sorry- I forgot to say where- DUH!
Check under the eagles beak -there seems to be a spike under the end of the beak and further to the right- there seems to be extra feathers/curl etc
|
|
Valued Member
United States
133 Posts |
These are typical clash marks for the eagles neck and your correct that they are from her hair about midway from the ear down to the chin line. On the obverse look in front of the neck and the second hair vee for letter transfer and above her bonnet band for mint mark. On the reverse its below the tailfeathers (E type coins) or the designer "m" between the d and w. It has to have a clashed letter to count as a clashed Morgan VAM. Coins that have clashing but no letter transfer don't get the sub-letter. The exception is the 1886-P VAM-1C (3+2).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2797 Posts |
Chuckster, That's a nice 83-O and I haven't seen the clashing exhibited here. But, I have seen other clashes on both the 83-O and the 85-O that aren't mentioned in VAMWorld (in the olive branches). First, ignore that clash and see if you can match it up with any of the current 83-O VAMs listed. Unfortunately, there aren't many pictures for the 83-O in VAMWorld. It could end up a new clashed sub-variety of a current 83-O VAM.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
527 Posts |
I am intrigued by this, usually the clashes start in other areas. Where this does line up with the hair on the reverse, I am concerned about the absence of clashes in the other areas. The areas by the top inside of the wreath should show the clashing first. The lips and back of the hat from the obverse are usually the first clash marks to appear on the reverse. Check to see if they are present. I guess it would be possible that the other clash marks have been polished, but I am not sure. I would like to see pictures of the full obverse and reverse straight on. If you could post those it would be helpfull. Here is a die clash diagrahm. I put red circles where you should check the reverse for clashes. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
527 Posts |
Sorry, there are actually three locations I would check. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Here are new pictures- I can't get a full obverse and reverse- focus keeps going blurry on me. I tried to get pictures based on your graph- hope this works- Since I'm a newbie at this, I don't see anything out of the ordinary besides what I originally found. Image: morgan3jpeg1.jpg62.38 KB Image: morgan3jpeg2.jpg62.56 KB Image: morgan3jpeg3.jpg58.86 KB Image: morgan3jpeg4.jpg57.47 KB Image: morgan3jpeg5.jpg46.28 KB Image: morgan3jpeg6.jpg52.99 KB Image: norgan3jpeg7.jpg40.39 KB Maybe I'm overlooking something thats really there, but I'm not aware of it? Thanks for the help 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
527 Posts |
They should be obvious if they are there. Here are some picture examples. Ignore the arrows pointing to the die cracks, the shapes inside the circles are what I am reffering to. Hopefully SuperDave will come along and look, he is a lot better with Morgans than I am.  
|
|
Valued Member
United States
133 Posts |
Study that die clash guide real good and remember that your dealing with partial letters here. Take into account the die clash rotation too, that's why some have a partial "I" or "G" in front of the neck. This also changes the position of the mint mark and how much of the last part of "Trust" is showing in the second hair vee above the 1st and 2nd right stars. The lips and back of the cape are only going to show you wreath clashing and we are after letter transfer. On the reverse of your coin, check under the left side of the tail feathers for a partial clashed "E". Consider VAMs 22A and 36A(the most common of the two)and check out the pictures in VAMWORLD for them. This "E" will be slightly slanted and laying on its back, it's from the word "LIBERTY" on the obverse. Take a look at a 1891-O VAM 1A for a real good understanding of how this "E" looks and remember die rotation changes this a bit. Good luck and letters, letters, letters.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
This isn't a "new" clash - it's 125 years old.  Keep in mind with clashes that the Mint usually tried to polish them out of the die as soon as they're discovered. This coin could be an existing, known clash which has been polished out. Another consideration is the fact that a clash is not, in and of itself, enough to cause a separate VAM designation. This is not a unique die pair; at best, it's a clashed version of an existing, known VAM. So, for the attribution on this one, I'd be looking for those features which don't involve clashing - in the case of the 1883-O, mostly doubling in the date and mintmark placement.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
OK!
Thanks again for everyone's help on this- I'll be going over this coin obv and rev with a fine tooth comb to see any signs of Letter/Number/ MM doubling etc. Let you all know if I find anything- I'll post pics asap.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
Hey Chuckster, Your coins appears to be the VAM 36a by the photos.. Looks to have the clashing at the wheats on obverse and also wing clash on obverse is in the correct position. On the reverse there is a crack above the Mint mark... Nice variety, though fairly common.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
This "clash" under the eagles beak, is not one always seen, how ever it is well know do to the "CLASHING" overlays as presented above..... However.....in the case of the 1883-0......."E CLASH" it is a reality of the clashing lasted from the time the E# was VISABLEY present....and yhe time after the die was repolished the E diassapeared....NOTE that the die cracks are present when the E clash is known......and the die cracks are still present after the re-tooling, BUT NO E is found... NONE of your pictures looks or shows close ups for the E CLASH area. to determine if there is an E clash present or not....Truthfully this is the true evaluation if it it a 36A The Vams progression went from the VAM 36, to the "E clash" of VAM 36A, then to... after re-tooling it reverted to the VAM 36..as the E clash is not present...... The descive point where the progression starts and ends lies within the die crack that goes from the tail feathers though the "O" mint mark..... when the crack is obvious,,but does not go entirely from tail feather through the mint mark and back up into the tail feather much like a you as can be seen on VAM world...THE E CLASH can be present.......in any even if not seen it is a VAM 36, and not an VAM 36A,,,so we now look to your close ups of the mint mark and the area just left and down of the mint mark to see if the E clash is present.....GHood luck! G
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
The strong clashing above the cap should be indicative of an E clash on the reverse, though not always.. the clashing above the cap can be seen even on later die states when the E has been gone for some time. Based also on the extent of the reverse crack above the MM, I would guess 36a... as the coin reverts back to a v36 or onward, the crack becomes very extensive.. CHECK for that E!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
Picture 3 (the one with the clashing above cap) looks like you MAY wish to at least check the 1883o VAM 1H listing. The reverse doesn't looks quite as cracked up as the 1H, but it's hard to tell by the pictures.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
Ohh geeze, I am new here and didn't realize I was posting on a 5 year inactive thread! Need to learn how to navigate the pages. .
|
| |
Replies: 26 / Views: 6,581 |