|
This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!
To participate in the forum you must log in or register. | Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 4,620 |
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
91 Posts |
Even though I am quite new to the party here and I don't post that frequently, some of you might know that I mostly specialise in the Warring States era-coinage. But even the most hard-core specialists (not that I am one though), sometimes feel the urge to buy something out of their area of specialization. Well, to make a long story short, this is what I bought on a local coin fair this weekend:    Sycee's! Or "Yuanbo", as the correct Romanization now is. In my opinion, one of the most interesting forms of money ever to be used in China, besides those during the Warring states period, of course ;). I had been looking for a sycee for quite some time, but was put off by the price. Most of these are far heavier than mine, thus a whole lot more expensive. While visiting a local coin fair this weekend however, I was pleasantly surprised when I found these two being offered. The seller normally deals in provincial Dutch coins, but had quite a few primitive and other non-standard late Asian coinage for sale. Right from the start, I told myself to be cautious. I am nowhere near an expert on Sycee's, and they were being offered on a show, and not by a dealer who was renowned for being an expert on Asian coinage. After examining them in hand and finding fairly little wrong with it from what I could tell, I decided to weigh them. The slightly larger one clocked in at around 38 gram, which would be approximately one Tael, the main unit of weight during this period, and a common weight for small sycee's. The other one weighted around 27 gram, about the weight of a silver dollar/an 8 real. Also a common weight for smaller Sycee's. Still, I wasn't completely convinced. "fake until proven guilty" is what applied here, and rightly so. As with most forms of Chinese coinage, the amount of fakes on the market is astonishing. I asked the seller where he got the lot, seeing as he had more Asian silver for sale (Thai bullet's, lat's, etc.). He had bought the entire lot, which came in an amazing wooden "treasure-chest", from the relatives of a deceased collector quite a few years ago. The collection was amassed before WWII, possibly even when sycee's where still in use within China. The fact that it is such an old collection does not immediately mean that they are genuine, yet do point in somewhat the right direction. But combining all this, plus the fact that I felt so fascinated by them, I finally decided to buy them. They have an excellent return policy, but let's hope for the best. I am certainly no expert on Sycee's, but I think they make quite a fun addition to my collection, regardless of their authenticity. I am still in the process of authenticating them for 100%, reaching out to several far more experienced collectors, but I just couldn't wait with posting them here. These sycee's belong to the so-called "Broken silver" category. Not that these were actually broken off of anything, but any sycee under 5 tael belonged to this category. The large sycee's where mostly used for taxes, huge transactions or for stacking. These smaller ones however, were mostly used for every day, smaller purchases. One Silver Tael equalled to roughly 1500~2000 cash coins, which would buy you about 25 litres of rice in late imperial China. Sycee's come in many different shapes and sizes, these being of the so-called "hen's-nest" type, because they, well. look like a hen's nest apparently. Sycee's where issued as far back as the Tang-dynasty, but only became really popular in the Ming and Ching dynasties. For the date of these, we should be looking at the latter half of the Ching Dynasty, somewhere in the nineteenth century. Besides just entirely fake sycee's, we also have another problem within this area of numismatics. In apparently the 60's and 70's, long after they were officially demonetized as a currency in China in 1933, the local inhabitants of the "Shan" region (Shan is Chinese for mountain, in this case the north of Thailand/ Burma/ Vietnam), a people with a long tradition of the usage of big chunks of silver as money, finally stopped using these as a currency. Smart businessmen then bought these for melt value, after all, they had no monetary value anymore, applied fake counterstamps to them, and sold them as historical artefacts, rather than simply bars of silver. A lot of these genuine sycee's with a fake counterstamp have found their way into numerous important collections. The same seller had another, similar sized, sycee for sale, but with a doubtful stamp that read "Guangxi". This of course being a then province, now autonomous-region, within China. Besides not having the budget (it was a little more expensive than both of these put together), I also am a little doubtful of this stamp. It is not the fact that the province is named that makes this stamp doubtful. After all, naming the region of origin on a sycee was a practice commonly done. However, we know of many stamps with the same lay-out and very similar calligraphy, each from different provinces. It would make fairly little sense, although it is not impossible, for a local silver trading company half-way across China to use such similar stamps. It could be however, that the fakers used genuine, official stamps as inspiration for their fake counterstamps, which could be the case here, seeing as the one they had for sale came from an old collection. Anyway, enjoy! I hope someone found it interesting, and if anyone has any comment or additions, feel free to post them! Oh and I apologize for the blurry pictures. Seeing as these don't fit underneath my scanner, I had to take pictures with my Phone. Terrible quality ensued. Kind regards, Mika Ps. I have placed this post in the "Ancient" coinage part of the forum. Due to their age, they might better fit under "modern" world-coinage or even bullion. However, when looking at the way these were made and used as a currency, I felt they would be more at home here. Should a moderator want to move them, no problems. Edited by AnYangMan 02/14/2017 5:59 pm
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Fascinating! Wow! Thanks for the tour and history lesson. I probably would never collect such as these, but love learning @ other types of money xfer's and a bit of story!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Very interesting pieces and excellent background history. To what date do you think these are from?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34442 Posts |
Very nice sycees @AnYangMan! I've been scared off of these by all the counterfeits and have yet to add one to my collection.
Also, no good way to fit them into 2x2s...
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I have yet to purchase anything like these. They are not quite in my collecting area, and, like you, have very little experience with them. However, I see nothing wrong with them as far as I'm concerned. As long as they are good silver, they should be fine. These unmarked "hen's nest" types are quite common. Or maybe the fakes are common. I don't know,
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7066 Posts |
Great pick-up's, Mika. Thanks for the interesting post. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Lead copper alloy to the same density as pure silver (10.5 g/cc), inside a thick silver jacket.
These sorts of fakes are extremely hard to detect. XRF no help. You need industrial ultrasound to detect the dud core.
For this reason, I have always been afraid of these. I can't pick 'em.
|
|
Valued Member
 Netherlands
91 Posts |
Thanks guys, appreciate the all the comments and compliments! ;) Indeed, excellent fakes do exist, which is also the reason I have been equally as careful with this type of coinage. But while holding these, I couldn't help falling absolutely in love with them. From the get go, nothing looked wrong, in my humble and non-expert opinion of course. They might be fake, or they might be genuine, I do hope to find out soon (if it possible at all), but in the meantime, they'll be getting a nice little spot in my collection. I have asked Stephen Tai, one of the leading experts on Sycee's, so we'll see. Saying something about their authenticity from only a picture is hard, but perhaps he instantly recognises something is off. Concerning the date of these; most likely nineteenth century, latter half I would say. Officially, they were officially demonetized in I believe 1933, and many were melted down into silver dollars. Most of the Sycee's were actually minted (I should actually say 'cast') at the peak of the Qing dynasty, about 1850-1890, although this is only a guess concerning my sycee's. sel_69l, your comment actually reminded me that density has been used when authenticating anything silver. I don't actually have a chemical lab in my backyard (no surprise, I imagine), but decided to use what little equipment I had to try and find the density. I somewhat managed to do that, but every reading was significantly different. Both sycee's seem to average at around a high 9/ low 10 gram per square centimetre. 10.5 is for pure silver I believe; so would these values be acceptable for my coins? A small calculation with 0.900 silver, an average fineness for these small sycee's: (10.5*0.9)+(8.89*0.1 (assuming the rest of the alloy is entirely made out of copper)= 10.33 gm/cc. In that case we could most-likely say that these are either authentic, or superb fakes, which as you mention, solve this problem by having a copper-lead alloy with exactly the same density. Entirely base metal fake should be of the table with these density figures, right? A local coin store, about the only one within a 50-mile radius, has a couple of bigger ones (boat and dish) for sale. I believe something like 5 tael each. The 'boat' actually has a dated stamped in, or actually an era name (NianHao). I have no intention of ever buying them, because 1) the price and 2) it was hard enough to say something about the authenticity of my small sycee's, let alone these monstrosities. Feast your eyes upon them.   Kind regards, Mika
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6130 Posts |
Very interesting stuff!
Even more than a lead-copper center, I imagine that one could cast one from period-correct silver and still make a very nice profit.
I have never really considered purchasing one, but I do have a small assortment of Japanese "mameita gin" which filled roughly the same role as the small sycees.
At any rate, I hope they turn out to be genuine!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Believable provenance is one thing; VERIFIABLE provenance is much more valuable.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 4,620 |
|
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.41 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|
| |
| |