Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Interesting Masonic Counterstamped 8 Reales

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,405Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
jdmern's Avatar
United States
1949 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2017  08:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jdmern to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
OK, sooooo... The working theory for jdmern's specimen should be that several decades back (when Cap & Rays by date and mint were not NEARLY the market they are today), a forger produced a batch of slightly variant copies of the 1846GC... and he or a distributor who knew its true nature took this example - a fake of the most common date GC 8R, which was probably an $8-10 coin back then? - masterfully applied (significant) wear and perfect circ cameo patina... AND procured correct-for-the-time punches to stamp Masonic symbols and the name of an actual obscure Canadian guy... in a complex effort to fool Cap & Ray collectors (who would surely gobble up a worn piece with distracting non-Mexican stampings on it)...

And certainly, all that effort for a not-super-expensive-at-the-time piece would have been needed to fool Jose the Average Peso Collector... you know, despite at least (3) examples having fooled major numismatic auctions and/or professional graders as a now $500+ coin in our day, Jose would have sniffed it out.

Seems plausible.

The quirks with the devices (detail), the oddness with the denticles... I can see that this ray poking the "8" style has a good chance of in fact being contemporary counterfeit... AND you could sell me on that Heritage piece even being a modern fake OF this contemporary counterfeit... but the totality of what we see/know says the OP's piece is simply NOT a latter-day concoction.

P.S. - It is also implausible to think, conversely, that this was a concoction targeted towards Canadian Masonic buffs - using (a fake of) a rare date 8R host to make it sexier. I would very highly doubt that - perhaps even to this day, let alone some decades ago - such collectors would at all care what obscure variety of Mexican peso was used as the host coin.


I must agree with much of what realeswatcher is saying here. Based upon the records I received in this collection I purchased, it would appear this piece has been in the same hands before I recently acquired it, since 1972. The patina of this piece is certainly that of a period piece, not of a modern forgery. The series of coincidences necessary for this piece to exist (Name of a small town in Canada that happened to have someone of the exact same name living there at the time of this, ect), as well as the effort it would take in forging, forging an exceptional patina, forging a very convincing counterstamp, and producing what would appear to me as a one off piece, seems to me, extraordinarily unlikely.

I am certainly not disputing anything swamperbob is saying in regards to the presses and manufacture, as this is certainly his area of expertise, and I only have a rudimentary working knowledge of these, but I would be nearly 100% in my confidence in saying that this piece was counterstamped in 1871. As for the actual striking date of the host, I would be foolish to assert any greater knowledge than the experts who are debating it here. It seems to me that it could be a contemporary circulating counterfeit, or, based off of the additional information realeswatcher brought in, there may be some previously acknowledged assumptions that may be wrong.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2017  8:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
realeswatcher Great detective work. The clincher in my opinion are the posts with the normal ray matrix and the questionable reverse. You also found a round cap version - the earliest 1846 matrix using the same eagle design.

This clearly indicates that the matrix for the "eagle with the hole in the elbow" was already in use at GC in early 1846 and that it represents an actual variant missed by Dunigan entirely. It also means that the Masonic version is present on a rather rare type.


Quote:
The working theory for jdmern's specimen should be that several decades back


That is actually not an accurate portrayal of my suspicions.

Actually, I was most concerned that the variant could date to the 1870-1930 time frame when it would have made sense to make a counterfeit from silver if there was a place to pass the coin "current at face value". This type of counterfeit creates profit not from debasing the alloy (which is often discovered relatively easily) but rather creates a profit from the difference between the actual intrinsic value of the metal and the legal value of the coin when placed into circulation. In 1885 the Cap and Ray 8R passed current in the Philippines, some parts of Malaysia and I believe Sumatra. These are the Class 2 silver counterfeits. They existed in the monetary supplies of many countries and persisted being produced into the 1930s. Some of these Class 2 coins are just being discovered today.

A numismatic forgery produced for the collector market is possible as long as the numismatic market for forgeries exists and is large enough to support a low margin per unit sold. I am not sure that such a market existed before 1950 - 1960. I mentioned 1950 as an earliest possible date for a numismatic forgery because that is the earliest that 8Rs were becoming collectable. Prior to that many 8Rs now seen as very valuable could still be found for well under $1.

Edited by swamperbob
02/17/2017 9:02 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2020  3:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Doing a little price research, I stumbled upon the following piece... reminded me of this post considering same rare mint/date 8R, both way up north in an area Cap & Rays generally did not circulate, both countermarked in the 1870s:

https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/l...-ef-or-finer
Interesting-Masonic-Counterstamped-8-Reales
Edited by realeswatcher
09/11/2020 4:03 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,405Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums