| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,546 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
Hi ... Please grade this *regular* coin Thanks in advance .   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
Quote:
*regular*  it's tough to tell from these pics but besides unattractive finger prints, it looks frosty and pretty clean, on the obverse mostly. ICCS would probably put this in a MS-65 holder. Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1747 Posts |
I am not by any means a proficient grader, but there is a serious gauge on the neck of the goose, and multiple dents on the wings. on the queen cheek there are multiple hits as well.
for me this is more of high AU, am I that off with my opinion? or am I skewed because of the overall appearance because of the finger prints and bag marks?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
AU 58
There is slight wear in the Queen's hair above the ear, also on the goose's shoulder and wrist area.
A lot of the dings and fingerprint appear to be post-mint.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 Canada
24885 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not really a fan of either, and certainly not a fan of ICCS. Personally, I don't think they'd get higher than 62 at any of the major US firms.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
228 Posts |
I'd say MS-63 for coin #1 and PL-64 for coin #2.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9865 Posts |
PL64
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,546 |
|
Posted 03/09/2017 09:20 am
