| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,888 |
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
30 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2133 Posts |
I can't zoom in.
Could you repost just with large images of the coins themselves, please ?
What do you think are the errors ?
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
30 Posts |
I'll try my best to rescale them it's mainly on the observe side there's small cracks in the coin,the F and G have parts missing and also I don't know what to call it but it looks like 1 or 2 layers of the coin have either been punched deeper or vice versa ( I'm just guessing ) the faces of the coin are in beautiful condition no scratches or anything so I'm guessing it was minted this way I'll try to post the larger pics thanks for the reply Pertinax
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
30 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
Not so much errors as die failure. It just looks like the die started cracking and otherwise falling apart when this coin was struck. This type of occurence is not going to be listed in a book.
Edited by EFLargeCents 03/16/2017 06:40 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
735 Posts |
I concur, not errors in the accepted sense but evidence of die wear. Nice condition though!
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
30 Posts |
Thanks everyone knowledge is power lol thanks for the books Hogarth there a really good read
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
64 Posts |
This is worth hanging on to - presumably there was quality inspection so that not many defective coins would have been issued. A quaint rarity!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
695 Posts |
On the contrary Victorian Copper + Bronze was notorious for errors mis-strikes , over-dates, Double struck coins Not as many as the charles II sixpences though :). In fact it is probably rarer to find a coin that has no error on it. Although some of the oddities do command high premiums.
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
30 Posts |
Cheers guys its true there are many common errors I'm new to coin collecting but there does seem to be more in the copper and bronze varieties hopefully I will learn more about other coins, but one step at a time cheers again
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17951 Posts |
I expect that in 1860 they were so desperate to get the new bronze coins out in quantity to replace the old copper ones that they tried to get as much use as possible out of each pair of dies... and perhaps they weren't used to striking the slightly harder bronze after the softer copper?
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
30 Posts |
I suppose it would be more cost effective to get as much out of a die a possible too, glad they did though makes an interesting coin
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,888 |
|