| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 2,138 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3098 Posts |
For fun I bought a small group of circulated Standing Liberty quarters including this well-worn Type 1. It's not a 1916 . . . rats. I can't be sure of the mint mark. I think it looks more like a D than S, but am not certain. Thoughts? Thanks. Old silver is fun.   Paul Bulgerin
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Uh, it's just a slick, so what does it matter?  Edited by Coinfrog
05/07/2017 9:28 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3098 Posts |
I know it's a slick, but I am curious about the mint mark. I haven't owned a mint marked Type 1 before.
Paul Bulgerin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
536 Posts |
As there are no stars under the eagle, it is indeed Type 1, however, my eyes are not good enough to tell what MM you have.
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5207 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1475 Posts |
 It seems like "D" mint mark.  Edited by Coconutjoe
05/07/2017 11:20 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
294 Posts |
It's a moot point, since all you have is the equivalent of a slug.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
looks like a "D" to me. You know somebody will pay a premium for it as a potential PO-1
|
|
CCF Advertiser
United States
1533 Posts |
Not for an SLQ, I think. There are many PO-1s out there. Dateless SLQs are available by the roll.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1000 Posts |
It doesn't matter that there's no date. If you can determine the date and mint mark from other design features, it's identifiable. PO1 1917 D Type 1.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,138 |
|
Posted 05/07/2017 9:37 pm
