| Author |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,825 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
487 Posts |
I finally got my camera to take some close up pictures and this coin looks so much better in hand than in the picture. I would guess this coin would grade MS 63 but the picture makes it look like went through the blender. Suggestions. Image: 1922b.jpg76.79 KB Image: 1922f.jpg63.4 KB
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
The only thing "wrong" with your pictures is that the White Balance is off, throwing the color off. The ugly truth about good coin photography is that cameras see and emphasize things the eye doesn't. A 64 in-hand is a 62 in the ruthless eye of a good lens, and that's the end of it. Your focus is sharp, your lighting isn't bad, the luster of the coin is obvious and you've done as well (with the minor exception of the White Balance) as you really need to do with the coin. The difference between a "good" coin photographer and a "great" coin photographer (I put myself in the first category) is twofold: First, the great shooters tend to shoot great coins. Second, the great shooters can, with their tools, practice what amounts to deception - depicting the coin as it looks in-hand, and not as it looks in the harsh reality of digital pixels. There's something to be said for poor coin pics. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
655 Posts |
Deception is such a cruel word.  And cruel is what some light sources are. No point in making a mountain out of a bag mark.  Scans hide bag marks pretty well. Direct lighting from a small aperture light source is the most harsh of all. Try indirect diffused light.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
quote: A 64 in-hand is a 62 in the ruthless eye of a good lens, and that's the end of it.
 Good macro lenses are unkind to coins, particularly higher-grade silver. As an example, here's a shot taken with a Nikon D70s and the 60mm macro Nikkor. The result almost looks almost whizzed in places with flat fields-- starkly different from the actual coin in hand. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
487 Posts |
Thanks all for the comments. learjet you said "Try indirect diffused light." how do you do that?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
655 Posts |
People and coins are both flattered by diffused light, so bounce the light source off something or through something. A white piece of paper, milk bottle, tissue, the ceiling, anything as long as it's white. There's some interesting examples of milk bottle shots on the forum somewhere.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2797 Posts |
scmoore61, There are also things you can do after the shot is taken to "tweak" the shot. If you have MS Office, open with "Picture Manager" and it allows you to adjust color, brightness and contrast, size, crop, etc. Here's your reverse with the color saturation and brightness/contrast adjusted. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
487 Posts |
Thanks Dave Thats great I'll give it a try.
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,825 |
|