I guess that a part of the issue is the quality of the photos. Just using the wrong light makes anything look horrible, for example. It may also be an error by NGC, as they're just a bunch of humans doing some work under a lot of time pressure. To error is human, to moo bovine. Or something like that.
For what I can see, I think it's indeed an error coin struck on a clipped planchet. The photos from NGC are simply appalling and make the coin look very unattractive. The seller coins look much better to me. For what I can see from the details, it's really an uncirculated coin, yet it shows traces of having been on this planet for almost 200 years. Thus, a low MS rating would be justified. I wonder what this coin would tell if it could talk about its life story.
Anyway, that's just my opinion.
For what I can see, I think it's indeed an error coin struck on a clipped planchet. The photos from NGC are simply appalling and make the coin look very unattractive. The seller coins look much better to me. For what I can see from the details, it's really an uncirculated coin, yet it shows traces of having been on this planet for almost 200 years. Thus, a low MS rating would be justified. I wonder what this coin would tell if it could talk about its life story.
Anyway, that's just my opinion.



















