| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,440 |
|
|
New Member
United States
17 Posts |
Hi all, new to forum. Found an odd cent coin roll hunting this morning. Strange abrasion(s) on obverse ending right in line with Lincoln's nose. Consistent patina suggesting it was done at mint or very soon thereafter. Any input appreciated on what may have caused this, what it's worth, etc. 
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. Pic of reverse please. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
 Thinking its a type 1 large date, that's been damaged and bent after strike. Reverse show anything? I tried to zoom in from my end, but image gets to distorted in the process. Thanks, Doug.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188765 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
 to the forum Imprinted PMD, no error.
Edited by Crazyb0 10/06/2017 2:43 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7512 Posts |
I agree with Halo & Crazub0, damaged/bent due to getting hit hard.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Same here.  to the CCF!
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
 thanks for the welcome everyone.  So the reverse has a gentle convex sloping opposite where the mark is. Almost looks like a weak planchet (damaged in its inception) could've caused it to buckle there. What's the name for this? I'm gonna hold onto it regardless but I'm wondering how rare this type of error is for this coin. The more I look at it, the more I'm convinced this is a mint error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5193 Posts |
 , I agree that's PMD and not an error, the reverse is proof of it.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Thank you for the reverse pic. It is not an error,just post mint damage.Sorry. John1 
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
thanks for the clarification. I like you guys already.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,440 |
|