| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,259 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
493 Posts |
Thanks for your time. I would say VF, not sure?   |
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
I'm usually quite conservative, it's better than a VF Too much detail left and feathering is solid. A few major contact marks but the rims look good, XF45-50. may even go AU53
Spend time in an older blue whitman folder by chance?
Edited by Crazyb0
11/07/2017 11:58 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
 Better than VF, possibly AU-55. In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
493 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
AU-50. Nice surfaces too.
|
|
New Member
49 Posts |
AU for sure. I just hate to assign a number value unless I can see it better than that. Hairlines, carbon spots, Verdigris stains these are all things that love to hide in plain sight. BUT not to take away from your coin... |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3058 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19968 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I am at AU-55 from those pictures.
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
BadThad, what scale you using? Seriously, never heard of an AU(50--59) in MS(60-70) category?  |
|
Valued Member
United States
467 Posts |
A low AU 50.... Wheat stalks on reverse show more wear than I like for a AU, borderline VF 45 IMO... Nice coin though....
|
|
Valued Member
United States
467 Posts |
Looking at some of Bad Thad's grading, starting to think his act is hyjacked.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,259 |
|
Posted 11/08/2017 12:05 am
