| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,451 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
772 Posts |
I have this 1909S wheatie and am curious if it is genuine or not. Personally, I think it is genuine, but I am no counterfeit spotter.  
|
|
|
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
I can't see the point in faking a 1909 S without just adding a VDB to the back - tons more value. I'm no counterfeit spotter either though, but I don't see a point.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12813 Posts |
To me, the mint mark looks too crisp relative to the rest of the coin (it kinda "pops" immediately), but yeah... why fake it, especially in this condition. Maybe this was a practice coin for some budding counterfeiter. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
 To the Forum.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
 with the above sentiments. The mm does look a bit out of place, but why go through the trouble of faking it? 
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
S certainly looks laid on. The questions asked, citing why not a VDB, might be the very reason why it was created without one.
Die marker checks required.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It looks fine. That is a known position for genuine 1909-S mintmarks and unless you see an obvious seam between the mm and the adjacent field there are no worries. Use a 7X or more powerful loupe at a 45 degree angle to check it.
It looks like a $50 coin to me.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
772 Posts |
Sweet! Good to know for sure. Thank you all for your opinions, it is much appreciated!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
If you can, try a bit of acetone on the MM. In any event, examine it very closely with your magnifier. I think it's probably OK.  to the CCF!
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,451 |
|