It's the reverse of the coin that sticks out more.... The details are clearly legible & It really doesn't look "worn" to me on the details just thicker and more pronounced. I know my camera work does it no justice but aside from Light scratches and nicks the coin looks very well struck to me and it's noticeably different than almost all my other Nickels in similar condition from that decade... you very well may be right but maybe once I get a better camera I'll repost with clear close-ups.