| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 4,497 |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Looks like Master Die doubling on a proof coin. Going to have to check to see if this happened a lot on the proof dies. 1972-S DDO FS-101  Note the notch on the 'G' on GOD is present on FS-101. I don't see it on the OPs coin. I found example of the Master die doubling also on the Proof 1972-S cents. So it was also on them, but not a lot of them had this so far: 
Edited by coop 02/03/2018 9:48 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
616 Posts |
Quote:Remember, when TPG's grade coins, including doubled dies, they typically use a 5x loupe. Not 100x or 250x. Just 5x. Do they make 100x & 250x loupes? Really?  I use a 10x jewelers loupe that I've had for years. So you're telling me it's 5x too much?  Anyways, you're missing my point...a working die that was created from a re-engraved Master die is not the same thing as a working die that was created by a hubbed doubled Master Die, right? To my understanding, each Die type would produce two completely different types of varieties. Yet every time someone posts a possible 1972 DDO on here they are told what they are seeing is the result of a hub doubled Master Die which is VERY confusing when you attempt to apply what you've learned, to what you are seeing on the coin. Which in the case of my coin, would NOT be considered a doubled die at all, but a proof coin that was struck from a working proof die that was hubbed from a unique, yet very poorly re-engraved Master Die.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here is how the Master Hub, Master die, Working Hubs and Working dies are created:  There are two master dies made. If one of them are hub doubled, the 50% of the dies would he master die doubled. On the 1972 coins, we see a lot of Master die coins. The second image I posted was one of the master die proof hubs. I checked on PCGS and only found two examples of these there. The best one I posted in the second image. I was not aware there was MDD on the proof cents. (new thought to me)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
616 Posts |
Quote: There are two master dies made. If one of them are hub doubled, the 50% of the dies would he master die doubled. On the 1972 coins, we see a lot of Master die coins. The point I'm trying to make Coop is that the 1972 Master Die wasn't hub doubled. The characteristics seen on one of the two Master Die's used to hub 50% of all working dies was actually the result of a poor re-engraving of the Master Die itself by one of the Mint engravers. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
616 Posts |
If it was such a significant case of Master Die doubling, why did it not even garner a mention under the Master Die doubling section of ERROR-REF.COM? I would think that the 1972 LMC would be considered more relevant than the Master Die doubling on 1918 LWC or even the 1960 SD LMC, if it was indeed a genuine case of Master Die doubling. http://www.error-ref.com/master-die-doubling/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
616 Posts |
And let's not ignore the obvious...when looking at the coin, which of the two makes makes more sense? Re-engraved die or Hub doubled die? If it is the result of genuine hub doubling, what class would it be considered? I always considered the characteristics of the 1972 "Master Die doubling" a confusing exception to the rule of hub doubled dies because it just never really made sense to me. But now that I find out it was the result of a re-engraved Die, it makes a whole lot more sense.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The above quote you posts\ed says it was his "contention that is was from a re-engraved master die." So what is the source of that quote from? Experts from different sites all the time disagree with each other. Added: Never mind, I just re-read the previous post on the CONCEA site. It was not that I was doubting as much as I was wanting to see a source. I missed the images from the Variety Vista site from before or were added after I posted. I felt it looked like that to me, just needed who brought this idea up. Thanks for this information update to me.
Edited by coop 02/05/2018 12:44 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
A fine point of difference in OP's earlier posted pix of the you in TRUST looking like VV, it doesn't upon closer look, it is MDD, period, dot. End of story. The shift is SE on MDD the shift on VV DDO is East. Similar IS NOT identical.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
616 Posts |
Quote:A fine point of difference in OP's earlier posted pix of the you in TRUST looking like VV, it doesn't upon closer look, it is MDD, period, dot. End of story. The shift is SE on MDD the shift on VV DDO is East. Similar IS NOT identical Of course that is Machine Doubling, that fact is obvious. You would think that they would have found a better example to use as the reference coin. However, it is a fine example showing that both forms of doubling (machine & hub doubling) can exist on the same coin:)) Through my research into this enigma known as the 1972 Master Die doubled LMC, I finally realized that my coin is NOT a doubled die at all, after I discovered that what I was seeing was in fact the result of a re-engraved Master Die it all began to make perfect sense. Here.....maybe these visual aids will help.   
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 4,497 |